Anger can be a good moral motivation
Debate Rounds (3)
(1) Some sensations perform as support if they used for good.
(2) Anger is necessitating: no fight can be succeeded without it, without its filling the mind and lighting enthusiasm.
(3) People become morally better as persons by anger on themselves.
(4) Therefore, anger is a good moral motivation
People should adopt it and it can have some good consequences.
For example in World War II people would not fight and win against Germans without anger.
Or when people feel angry at themselves they try to make others feel different and do moral deeds.
Anger is nothing more than a cowards drug used to be brave for a moment. Actions that are good are always good, with no emotion needed. The statement you made about people becoming morally better as person through anger is IRRELEVANT. People become unstable and irrational when angry, because once you get mad, you will end getting angrier until you eventually explode. Anger is the proper way for a man to destroy himself, rather than do what's right in a situation.
People fought the germans based on the actions they were doing being morally wrong. No emotion intended.
But with anger you won't back up. You will stay till the end, which does not apply with drugs.
People cannot do their deeds and do not feel anything, there must be any emotion.
It is not necessarily the case that person will go crazy and destroy himself. But for example, if you fail exam, you become angry and next time will try to do it much better.
Russians fought not because of actions, but because of anger.
Not only can drugs compare to anger but so can a alcoholic beverage. Have you ever been with your friends and you take couple drinks? But that one friend takes it too far, and wants to fight everybody. He is not angry, however that's how he's acting. Anger is of no use in a moral situation.
What I meant is that in comparison to other emotions and stimulus anger is strong enough to let you go till the end. And people more likely to finish their plans with anger, not for example with love.
It is irrelevance, because we talk about anger, not the alcoholic motivation.
And it is not necessarily the case that you want to fight everybody when you are angry. But it is used as help when you need a little more courage. People fight for the right thing and with anger it becomes easier.
Anger is a horrible motivator. It will cause poor decision making and judgement. Also, it will cause irrational behavior, which could have negative outcomes. Anger is of no use when deciding what's morally right.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.