Anger is a good moral motivator
Debate Rounds (3)
The situation can also add more values to the emotion of anger. Such as fighting, anger can play a great motivator to the person. The person that feels anger will have more emotions and values. He wants to protect his own values. ANGER IS NOT NECCESARILY THE CASE BECAUSE A PERSON CAN JUST FIGHT ANOTHER PERSON FOR FUN. Drunkenness would also be useful. It makes the drinker more hasty and fearless to fight. IT IS IRRELEVANT IF A PERSON JUST PASSES OUT, ANGER WILL BE USELESS. It brings inspiring ideas to a person to fight. Anger can be a replacement for courage. So, anger can be used to make people better.
IT IS NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE THAT anger is a good moral motivator when it comes to fighting because drunk people and angry people can target innocent people. It is basically putting the innocent people who did not harmed the anger person at risk for there health. If anger is deemed as a good moral motivation when it comes to fighting then safety as we know it will not exist because everyone will be afraid and edgy. That is a lie because you can feel anger without being disrespected. as example if i feel irritated by your answer in class i will feel angered to give my view to counter claim your arguement. Like we are doing know we are debating and im getting angered without feeling disrespected because i feel fustrated you don't agree with me.
IT IS NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE THAT you do not feel anger without being disrespected. You do feel disrespected when your view is argued back. You are feeling slighted. Therefore you are feeling anger. As I am debating against you. You are feeling frustrated because I do not agree with you. You are feeling disrespected because I do not agree with you.
Sharks do not have control over there thirst for blood because once they smell it they have to chase down its prey whether it be human or a fish it does not show any sympathy. Sharks use there anger and rage to rip apart there prey and they cant control when and how much anger is enough. So when you compare it to a lot of things anger is an emotion that is UN controllable that is why they call it anger. It is an emotion but it is one that no one can harness. So anger is another beast itself.
IT IS NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE THAT sharks use anger to hunt. They use their amazing senses to hunt under water. Their sense to smell the blood is keener than most animals. They do not use anger or rage to ripe apart their preys. They use their ability and strength to do it. The reason they do it is to eat and prosper. Ripping apart the prey might not even be anger. It can be their will to feast, or there might not be any emotions. A shark can control its emotion.
IT IS NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE THAT emotions are uncontrolled. Emotions are controlled to whatever species. From humans, to hulks, to sharks, they can control their feelings such as anger. A person will use anger to avenge their death mothers. Hulks will use their anger to smash.
My conclusion to this whole argument is that anger everyone faces but cannot control. So if it is viewed as something that cannot be controlled and brings unexpected out comes then guess what that is anger that is why it is so dangerous. That is why anger is not a good moral motivation because its like motivating the people to have unexpected outcomes when really they shouldn't. again anger is the emotion that defies them all so anger is a beast such as hulk but it is one that could never see the controller.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.