The Instigator
ATHSAJM
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ClashnBoom
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

Animal Cruelty

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
ClashnBoom
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/1/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 367 times Debate No: 72708
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

ATHSAJM

Pro

Animals should replace technology
ClashnBoom

Con

I gladly accept this debate. It is up to pro to prove why animals should replace technology.
Debate Round No. 1
ATHSAJM

Pro

ATHSAJM forfeited this round.
ClashnBoom

Con

Animals cannot replace all of our technologies and get tired more easily so it is illogical to replace our current technology for animals.
Debate Round No. 2
ATHSAJM

Pro

ATHSAJM forfeited this round.
ClashnBoom

Con

Why'd you create a debate you cannot even commit to?
Debate Round No. 3
ATHSAJM

Pro

ATHSAJM forfeited this round.
ClashnBoom

Con

Animals are tortured enough.
Debate Round No. 4
ATHSAJM

Pro

ATHSAJM forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by really12 1 year ago
really12
Wow, the instigator of this debate did not post any rebuttal at all.
Posted by Tumblrnatic 1 year ago
Tumblrnatic
@athsajm are you saying animal cruelty is good? Please clarify this for other people would consider accepting this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by EAT_IT_SUKA 1 year ago
EAT_IT_SUKA
ATHSAJMClashnBoomTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: PRO forfeited and CON didn't, therefore, points are awarded to CON for better conduct. No spelling or grammar errors were made. CON argued and PRO didn't, therefore, points are awarded to CON for more convincing arguments. No sources were used, therefore, no points are awarded for more reliable sources. CON clearly won.
Vote Placed by Jupiter1 1 year ago
Jupiter1
ATHSAJMClashnBoomTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro has forfeited
Vote Placed by Tumblrnatic 1 year ago
Tumblrnatic
ATHSAJMClashnBoomTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Clash didn't forfeit any rounds.