The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Animals on the brink of extinction should be sent to the zoo

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Debates4life777 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/19/2017 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 374 times Debate No: 105998
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)




Animals should not be sent to the zoo if they are on the brink of extinction. 1st. The zoo does not know how to take care of a sickness the animal could have. 2nd. The zoo would be oblivious to why the animals are going extinct and the change of climate could kill the animals themselves. 3rd. People could throw their food into the animal exhibit which could cause harm to the animals or even worse.


I completely believe that animal species who have been discovered to be on the brink of extinction should be kept in zoos. I assume the second round is for arguments, and the third rebuttal. Good luck!
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Autistic_Spider 2 years ago
In that case we're going to need a lot more prisons to house all these stupid humans chugging along 'full steam ahead', business as usual...
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.