The Instigator
Pro (for)
5 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
1 Points


Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/15/2014 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 482 times Debate No: 52585
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)




I tihink that anonymus is a group of people who want to change the world in a good way
They are a group who fight against Iliminati devlis people who want to take over the world
Yes there is some stupid people and they do hackong youst to get rich...but anonymus jut wants freedom
Debate Round No. 1


Yea but they are Legion there is no one to pull the string but they exist not as a group but they exist


They exist? Oh really? Have you even seen my sources?! Even google searches reveal "anonymous" instead of "anonymus". Spell better next time bro!
Debate Round No. 2


my spelling is bad but if they dont exist who then done operation pay back

clearly shows us that "Internet activists" were the ones who attacked. Not your "Anonymus" group.
You lose.
Vote con!
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Duncan 2 years ago
Devil's Advocate much?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by OliveJuice 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Personal Matter: Irrelevant. Conduct: Voted as I did because of the disparity between the neutrality of Pro and the aggressiveness of Con. Spelling and Grammar: Both had errors. Arguments: No valid arguments with support were presented on either side. Sources: Neither had legitimate sources to back up their claims (in order to back up a claim, you have to first make a claim).
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wasted his time in this debate. He harped on a spelling mistake and in his last source it states in the first sentence: Operation Payback was a coordinated, decentralized group of attacks on high profile opponents of Internet piracy by Internet activists using the "Anonymous" moniker. Argument to Pro, conduct to Pro (Con was unprofessional in his attack), spelling to Con. Con was the only one to provide sources, but his own sources were also his own downfall - no sources points awarded.