Anti Vaccination is non sensical
Debate Rounds (2)
Looking at it from my view even someone who is anti vaccine for personal or religious reasons is viable. Although I'm going to stick to the thought of medically exempt children and adults. Being medically exempt means according to a certified and usually specialized doctor that a person or persons cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons. These children and adults include people with cancer and , auto immune. These people's lives they matter saying there medical reasons are non sensical is bogus. We don't have one size fits all genetics. Why do we have one size fits all vaccine schedules.
These people could die from a vaccine. A life, many lives would be lost if these people were to accept a vaccine. Not only that but patients of chemo drugs can't even be around a person that has had a live vaccine. It makes complete sense to me to protect a child or a loved on by not being vaccinated. To help ensure that something else doesn't happen to them. Seems perfectly logical to me, as a sister and as a friend of many vaccine injured and medically exempt children and adults.
Vaccines fail all the time so these basic illnesses are running ramped anyway. The whooping cough outbreak in Califoinia is just one of the many failed attempts at sussesful vaccine making. Only three percent of the population was unvaccinated. The rest were vaccinated and still got sick. They got sick from the vaccine that they were given. Best part is that it lasted longer in those who got the shot. I was required to get the shot for school. I was sick for one-hundred and thirty-two days. The rest of my unvaccinated family never caught it The Whooping Cough. Or at least if they did had a much milider case of it with no symptoms and no fever. They are all now immune to whooping cough. I am not. My immune system never took to the shot and left my body shell shocked.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by JMCika 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Anti Vaxers are pseudo scientists in disguise.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.