The Instigator
Koupo275
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
vi_spex
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Anything is debatable

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/19/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 788 times Debate No: 72018
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (14)
Votes (0)

 

Koupo275

Pro

This should be impossible to accept.
if you accept without receiving my permission, you will auto-lose.
The topic will be said on 1st round.
1,000 characters max.
72 hours to argue.
5 rounds to argue.
Forfeiting = auto-lose.
I will debate anything that you want to debate.
vi_spex

Con

no one can see these Words on the screen with their eye closed
Debate Round No. 1
Koupo275

Pro

I am afraid that I do the time do a argument, but I will spend the next 3 rounds arguing that metaphysical idealism is possible (or true).
Here's a link below for Idealism.
http://en.wikipedia.org...
vi_spex

Con

you cant argue with it, it isnt debatable

possibilities are false

know is physical, belief and knowledge is mental

kNow=Physical experience
Debate Round No. 2
Koupo275

Pro

"no one can see these Words on the screen with their eye closed"
Under Metaphysical Idealism , this is possible to see the words on the screen while having the eyes closed since what A metaphysical idealism will say that you are "seeing" a idea of a computer screen with words while also having a idea of having your eyes closed.
Since metaphysical idealism says everything is either a mind or a idea, it also makes the "Know = Physical experience" debatable since idealism reject's the idea of physical things.

"possibilities are false"
This a very vague statement, I recommend Con to expand and explain this statement on the next turn.

"belief and knowledge is mental"
as above with false thing.
vi_spex

Con

so you put on a false word view to "debate", obviusly you are already wrong

Debate Round No. 3
Koupo275

Pro

"so you put on a false word view to "debate", obviusly you are already wrong"
Last round, Con only gave the above bare assertion.
vi_spex

Con

it isnt debatable wheather a blind man can see or not, blind is defined as that


just argue that you can close your eys and keep on reading on your screen.. its not that hard?

Debate Round No. 4
Koupo275

Pro

Koupo275 forfeited this round.
vi_spex

Con

thats right
Debate Round No. 5
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by YoshiBoy13 1 year ago
YoshiBoy13
1: I think he means "to know" and/or "the knowledge (of)"
2: I can't really vote on this, because neither of them have actually answered the proposition, as far as I can see.
Posted by n7natnat 1 year ago
n7natnat
No
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
know=physical experience
Posted by Koupo275 1 year ago
Koupo275
Can you please define the word "Know" as you keep using it.
Posted by n7natnat 1 year ago
n7natnat
lol
Posted by n7natnat 1 year ago
n7natnat
yea. it is.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
is it then debatable...

that is not on the screen
Posted by n7natnat 1 year ago
n7natnat
and technically I can see them with my eyes closed. I have a thing called "my memory" to recall the words and view them in my "mind". Such a great tool.
Posted by n7natnat 1 year ago
n7natnat
what? no of course I wouldn't be able to see the words. But that isn't even what the debate is about. Your random sayings are so unreasonable, that even by your logic it's ridiculous.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
so you are arguing that you can see these Words on the screen with your eyes closed?
No votes have been placed for this debate.