Apple A7 SOC is better than snapdragon 800 SOC
Debate Rounds (3)
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 75% higher clock speed than apple.
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later( than apple)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once than apple.
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads than apple.
so look snapdragon beast and better.
Clock speed does not count that much.
Apple blows away the snapdragon 800 on a single-core geekbench test and is currently want of the fastest.
Finally it's 64-bit which is a really good breakthrough for a mobile processor and makes it futureproof.
So Apple has bought the future here.
awsomecp173 forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Con dropped some of Pro's arguments, but Pro forfeited all together. Arguments and conduct to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.