The Instigator
Tryparatest
Pro (for)
Winning
9 Points
The Contender
segregory
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

Are Books Better Than The Movies?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Tryparatest
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/17/2016 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 6 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 294 times Debate No: 91383
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

Tryparatest

Pro

I think Books are better than movies because movies leave out stuff from the books,while the books are more explanatory. What is your Opinion?
segregory

Con

They are. They describe most of every detail. In movies there are videos and that just comes straight out. In books it describes how the character is feeling to do it. It points out details that you might not notice in the movie.
Debate Round No. 1
Tryparatest

Pro

Yes,thank you,you also get my point.Books do describe most of every detail,and they also point out details that you might not notice in the movie.That is all true to the point.
segregory

Con

I hope others can see the meaning in that.
Debate Round No. 2
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by ThatOneNerd00 6 months ago
ThatOneNerd00
This is not a debate when the con is agrees with the pro lmao
Posted by segregory 6 months ago
segregory
I meant to post a comment.
Posted by fixedwounds 6 months ago
fixedwounds
Why is segregory a con is he agrees on what pro says?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by BenD 6 months ago
BenD
TryparatestsegregoryTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: When Con agrees, Pro wins. This was a... singular debate. As con never refuted anything, pro get my vote on his arguments. Also, I wanted to say YES! Books are SO much better!!
Vote Placed by fire_wings 6 months ago
fire_wings
TryparatestsegregoryTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con agrees with the Pro side, therefore, vote Pro.
Vote Placed by Ockham 6 months ago
Ockham
TryparatestsegregoryTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct was good on both sides. Pro left out some spaces which should have been in his posts and capitalized odd words, so spelling and grammar goes to Con. Con never contested any of Pro's points and actually agreed with him the whole time, so arguments goes to Pro. No sources were used. What a weird debate.