The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Are Fine Arts actually useful in real life?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
bobosmith01 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/22/2016 Category: Arts
Updated: 1 month ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 226 times Debate No: 95580
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




Anyone who knows me knows that I love listening to music, seeing art, etc. It makes me go "wow" anytime I sense a lovely piece. But, it's not really accomplishing anything, is it? I want people to decide. Is simple entertainment useful? Is it even entertainment?


Prior to debate: Any of the following are defined as a "Fine Art" according to Melbourne University.
Film and Television
Music Theatre
Theatre Practice
Visual Art

Rebuttal: The fine-arts provide a form of entertainment to most, which is considered to be healthy for us. Having an absence a form of entertainment can potentially hurt someones mental moral. For persons with a sickness such as alias recognise fine-arts over other things. They would recognise songs and paintings that are significant to them over, faces. The fine arts are recognized by the Frontal lobe, rather than faces. This would provide a form of relief to mental desises.
Smiley face
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.