The Instigator
abby110301
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Wylted
Con (against)
Winning
17 Points

Are GM foods beneficial?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Wylted
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/17/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 680 times Debate No: 71852
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

abby110301

Pro

I think that GM foods are perfectly fine. We have been eating GM foods for 100s of years.
We all eat them without knowing. I dare you to abject.
Wylted

Con

I am against GM foods. They are unnatural and go against God.
Debate Round No. 1
abby110301

Pro

abby110301 forfeited this round.
Wylted

Con

Let's forgive that forfeit and just make this debate a round shorter.
Debate Round No. 2
abby110301

Pro

abby110301 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
abby110301

Pro

abby110301 forfeited this round.
Wylted

Con

GM foods are unhealthy, do not create greater yields, are not safe, the side effects are not completely known. http://www.responsibletechnology.org...

Vote me.
Debate Round No. 4
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
It appears so
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 1 year ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
I seem to be doing pretty well.
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 1 year ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
lol, I know how ya feel. I have been thinking about noobsniping and trolling lately. I gave it a try: http://www.debate.org...
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
I am bored, lol.
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 1 year ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
@Wylted, you seem to be in a noobsniping mood.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
abby110301WyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by YoshiBoy13 1 year ago
YoshiBoy13
abby110301WyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con: Triple forfeit COMBO!!!! Massive damage! // Both arguments pretty weak tbh // Sources to Con: Only used by Con // Grammar to Con: I abject to your grammar.
Vote Placed by ColeTrain 1 year ago
ColeTrain
abby110301WyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: A bit trollish on Con's part, but still gets everything. Conduct: forfeiture Spelling: "abject" is incorrect *object Convincing Arguments: Brought forth argumentation backed by evidence, what can I say? Sources: only sources used in the debate... Trolling win