Are Salamanders better than regular Fishes
Debate Rounds (2)
1. can you eat salamander?
2. can you fry salamander?
3. can you really have salamander as a common pet?
4. can salamander be considered sea food?
5. can you really see salamander as anything special to a aquarium?
The answer to all these question is no.
therefore fish is better
if you yes to any one of them something is wrong.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Enji 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argues that salamanders are better than plain old fishies because you can have them as pets and feed them from your hand. But as Con points out, you can have regular old fishes as pets, and you can eat them too. The benefits of eating and frying fish outweigh the benefits of holding a salamander, hence Con wins arguments. Conduct to Pro due to Con's insults ("cool aid [addict]")
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.