Are all people really equal?
Debate Rounds (3)
Equal- a person or thing is considered to be the same as another in status or quality.
Because all humans are not equal income is always different. This is a wonderful thing and encourages diversity amount the nation and the society. When you work harder you earn more then other people. When you get a education you learn more, witch usually allows you to be paid more. This is a god thing, but it is unequal to all humans. So if you want all humans to be treated as equals this means everyone must earn the same amount, and that has never worked and would be counter productive to our society and nation. When everyone gets paid the same amount it makes it so there is no reason to work harder, or to get a better education so you get a better job, or study more on subjects to hope to be paid more. This is why this is why it is unequal and should remain unequal.
Everyone looks different, some people are better looking as other thus they are not treated the same way as people who look ugly. People who where born without arms and/or legs are treated differently then people who where not born that way. My point is all humans look different, and due to that they are not all equal and should not be treated as such.
3. Grades/treatment of other humans
If someone for example gets a 100 on a national test they would be treated differently from someone who failed it. The guy that got the one hindered would have his teachers praising him and maybe even putting that on a form to whatever collage he would want to go to. But the guy the failed it would not get any of those thing thus it is not equal and they are not treated as equals.
So to wrap this round up for me, con how can all humans be equal when all humans have always be unequal. We do are best in cases of this inequality. The few times nations or societies try to make everyone equal it falls apart some way or another.
Now back to you con
So due to people having better homes then others, more money then others, being more intelligent then others, looks make humans not equal in those area's. Sometimes equality is god but only in moderation and not to the extreme. So we are not all equal right now and must likly never will be. Now back to you con I look forward to seen what you will say. You must prove everyone is equal, and everyone should be treated as equals. So there can be no inequality if I am hearing you correctly.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con easily gets the win, because Pro didn't even make any arguments on their part. All they did was refute Cons argument, which isn't convincing. Con actually provided arguments to back his case up, so I'm inclined to vote Con because he only presented a case.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.