The Instigator
Kylie.Cunningham
Pro (for)
Winning
10 Points
The Contender
ORONAMINz
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points

Are ghost real?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Kylie.Cunningham
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/10/2017 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 714 times Debate No: 100811
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (3)

 

Kylie.Cunningham

Pro

Yes I believe in ghost because when I'm home alone, I hear a bang when I'm downstairs or vice versa. People's spirits can go to heaven, hell or stay on this earth as a manifestation.
ORONAMINz

Con

It may be true that you heard a bang when you're alone , but we cannot necessarily say it was caused by ghosts.
For example , you may have mistaken the sounds of mice running for a bang.
So , your experience won't be a strong evidence for your claim.

In addition , science tell us that spirits don't exist.
Therefore I think ghosts are not real.
Debate Round No. 1
Kylie.Cunningham

Pro

http://www.livescience.com...

Ghost are talked about in the Bible and ghost are human souls that didn't go to hell or heaven. We can catch them on photos, audio and videos.
ORONAMINz

Con

Bible is a book written by someone in the past. It's not god's word.
So , even if ghosts are talked about in Bible , It's not always true to consider ghosts real.

And , many of photo , video , audio which catch a ghost are proved to be fake.
So , it won't be a strong evidence , either.
Debate Round No. 2
Kylie.Cunningham

Pro

How do you know that it isn't real, people see ghost all the time, people communicate with them all the time so why aren't they real??
ORONAMINz

Con

It is true that some people experience a wonderful and fantastic event R13;see , hear , or feel ghosts.
And those mystery can be explained only if we accept the existing of ghosts.

However , I believe that those can be explained by science and our intelligence , too.
In fact , your experience about bang could be explained without "ghosts".
And this explanation is more reasonable than ghosts existing.

Thus , I disagree with your opinion.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Kylie.Cunningham 1 year ago
Kylie.Cunningham
lol true maybe you would challenged me instead ^__^
Posted by What50 1 year ago
What50
Again how can I trust. This claim is based on your assumption it's paranormal activities. We need hard proof. Such as a tape or a video recording that shows a shadow beyond of the doubt it's paranormal activities.
Posted by Kylie.Cunningham 1 year ago
Kylie.Cunningham
Because we don't have a mice problem and when I go check it out I hear some more noises and it gets quiet when I get closer to the bedroom.
Posted by What50 1 year ago
What50
Pro you made a logical fallacy known as begging the question. You said " Yes I believe in ghost because when I'm home alone, I hear a bang when I'm downstairs or vice versa. " You assume it's a ghost banging the door so how are you correct?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by FlowerCrownedBitch 1 year ago
FlowerCrownedBitch
Kylie.CunninghamORONAMINzTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: I agree with Kylie 👌🏻
Vote Placed by DonutQueen 1 year ago
DonutQueen
Kylie.CunninghamORONAMINzTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I believe that Con has done a better job at providing points and refuting the points made by pro. Pro seemed to use opinion and religion as a standpoint for discussion as opposed to Con who used science as a reason to back up his/her case.
Vote Placed by kgbisafterme 1 year ago
kgbisafterme
Kylie.CunninghamORONAMINzTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: ORONAMINz you really need to stop doing this ( random word ,). you were killing me throughout with that. It's a space before the phrase or word but not after.