Are humans aliens?
Debate Rounds (3)
First of All,
My Friend I would like to tell you that our Brain is too Small to understand the Whole Universe because Universe is Larger and We are too small.
There aren't Enough evidences to prove that we are Aliens.
By the Way in the Dictionary
ALIEN: belonging to a foreign country.(Planet)
How can we Belong to a Foreign Planet I wonder.. When We ourselves has Derived the Word.
Also There is a lot of scientific evidence to show that we evolved from old world apes. An alien would be strange creatures from another planet. Our ancestors might have come from another planet but we have lived here for millions of years and adapted to life on earth. Therefore, we aren't aliens.
There are aliens but we aren't alien.
For your Example of Lizard.. THey aren't Evolved for Intelligence
Dr Ellis Silver Started this all and it caught fire Like a Rumor or Maybe it is a Rumor
We think we are Evolved but Our Brain isn't that much evolved our brain is Programmed in such a weird way that It can anything and Can see or remember the Thing that doesn't Even Existed.. or Never happened.
LOGICALLY YOU MIGHT BE CORRECT BUT TECHNICALLY AND SCIENTIFICALLY YOU MIGHT NOT.
Thanks for Raising this TOPIC
What can God do for this Debate. He can come and tell us that oye Humans you are Aliens.
DUDE such is your Belive and as I told you that Human Brain Can Remeber thing that doesnt even Happend like that I think God never Existed its Man created the GOD .
So whats your Point Regarding GOD?
all of the living human inhabitants of the earth . Humans (variously Homo sapiens and Homo sapiens sapiens) are primates of the family Hominidae, and the only extant species of the genus Homo.
Now I guess Aliens are not of the homo sapiens. And just because the rumour cought Fire you cant call humans Aliens.
ALIENS EXITS but We are not Aliens.
And I will stick to My Point Man Created God
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by kbub 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Thanks for an interesting debate. Pro has the burden of proof. Simply by advocating that nothing can be proved is not good evidence for or against the existence of aliens. Therefore, it would seem that Pro has forfeited the debate by suggesting that there can be no proof. Also, the god argument is entirely irrelevant. Pro's argument was quite incoherent. Con wins.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.