The Instigator
coolkid1231
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Arcanas
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Are people helping the oceans or not (pro for helping,con for not) And how many do you know. Are you

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Arcanas
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/28/2015 Category: Economics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 415 times Debate No: 72507
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

coolkid1231

Pro

yes people are helping the oceans and if you ever read the book going blue you will know that a lot of people are helping. my family. I am.

good luck ;D
Debate Round No. 1
coolkid1231

Pro

coolkid1231 forfeited this round.
Arcanas

Con

Giving Pro a chance
Debate Round No. 2
coolkid1231

Pro

coolkid1231 forfeited this round.
Arcanas

Con

BOP was on Pro for this debate and he did not fuffil it, I accept his full concession as he never made any real arguments.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by 11tmaste 1 year ago
11tmaste
It means you picked something that isn't really debatable. There is a true answer to the question you're asking. The answer is just plain yes and it can't be debated because we know it is true. You even state that you and your family are helping, so nobody can deny that. Frame your topic differently so there's something to have a discussion on. For example, "Are people hurting the world's oceans?" This is debatable. Your question is not.
Posted by coolkid1231 1 year ago
coolkid1231
what do you mean?
Posted by StalinIncarnate 1 year ago
StalinIncarnate
Another Truist debate topic. You can't accept one and reasonably win.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by NateTheFirst 1 year ago
NateTheFirst
coolkid1231ArcanasTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: BOP was not met and a Pro forfeited