Are technological advancement doing more harm than good, and causing society to move backwards
Debate Rounds (3)
The 20th century has also been marked as the deadliest in human history; and when you consider technology of the future, the 21st century doesn't look to good either; robots, drones, mass automation, sigularity, cybernetics, artificial intelligence, and human cloning, are all coming to a battlefield near you - that is, if they don't take your job first!
Technology also has the bad habit of opening up the pandora box of ethical issues that I simply would not trust the human race to deal with. I'll spare you the crazy laundry list of examples here -because their are many ways man tries to play God- but there are probably none more profound or urgent then Global Warming.
But for these reasons and more, we can contend that technology does cause society to move backwards.
Also ethical decisions are made based on peoples personalities, thoughts and beliefs. This is not affected by the technological advances in society. A personal choice to be ethical or not is an individual decision which cannot be changed solely by technology.
If anything the advancements in technology are being used as a scapegoat to cover up underlying problems with humans in modern society.
"If anything the advancements in technology are being used as a scapegoat to cover up underlying problems with humans in modern society."
Then you've just confirmed my point. Advanced technology has allowed man to scapegoat its problems and shrink away from its own sense of moral or ethical responsibility - where a fine example of this might be the violent and graphic nature of video games that promulgate violence, or the extreme nature of some birth control methods that allow a person to abort a child.
Reliance on technology also has the added bonus of creating dependency. I shouldn't have to explain this one too much, but someone who spends too much time on the computer loses quintessential life experiences that are important for areas like career-building, leadership, management, staying active, fitness, making friends, dialogue, and raising a family.
"It isn't logical to say that weapons cause wars between nations."
But several arms races throughout history have proven otherwise, the most famous example being the Cold War where "fear of the bomb" evoked the USSR and the United States into waging proxy wars and building massive arsenals of wmd in order to persevere a nuclear hegemony.
"Also ethical decisions are made based on peoples personalities"
Decisions are made through people, but the opportunities are created by technology. When Dr. Oppenheimer invented the atomic bomb he stated: "Now I am become death, the destroy of words." Which is just a creepy and apocalyptic way of saying "man can now do more evil."
And this statement holds true for even trivial things like "internet addiction" which would be impossible without the invention of the Internet, where a similar approximation could also be said of automobile accidents that might not have occurred had there been no such thing as texting and driving, to finally, something sinister like mass killings that should have been prevented had their been a just ban on firearms.
My original assertion in round 1, that technology increases man's capacity for evil, and that technology ultimately allows man to move backwards, still stands.
Sanaa forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.