The Instigator
SolarShooter22
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
MolecularBird06
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points

Are there Rules in Warfare

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
MolecularBird06
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/19/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 445 times Debate No: 46275
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

SolarShooter22

Con

First round is conformation.
MolecularBird06

Pro

I accept the challenge. There are rules in warfare. Armies cannot shoot at medics or attack hospitals attack men carrying the white flag or shooting men who are parachuting from a plane in distress and when they land they must be given a chance to surrender unless. it is apparent that they are engaging in a hostile act or attempting to escape. This does not include airborne troops, special forces, commandos, spies, saboteurs, liaison officers, and intelligence agents even if there plane is in distress. Counties cannot fight a war unless they have a distinctive uniform. Con will have to prove that these are not rules of warfare.
Debate Round No. 1
SolarShooter22

Con

SolarShooter22 forfeited this round.
MolecularBird06

Pro

Vote Pro, there are no arguments for Con.
Debate Round No. 2
SolarShooter22

Con

SolarShooter22 forfeited this round.
MolecularBird06

Pro

Con, Hello?
Debate Round No. 3
SolarShooter22

Con

SolarShooter22 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Actionsspeak 3 years ago
Actionsspeak
SolarShooter22MolecularBird06Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
SolarShooter22MolecularBird06Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF