The Instigator
Georgenewland
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
Walrus101
Pro (for)
Winning
15 Points

Are walruses the toughest animal in the world?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Walrus101
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/12/2013 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 661 times Debate No: 32396
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

Georgenewland

Con

I think sharks are tougher than walruses, for the simple fact that sharks can eat walruses.
Walrus101

Pro

I accept the challenge. I am already proving that Walrus are able to kill a shark, so being tougher won't be an issue.
Debate Round No. 1
Georgenewland

Con

Yes you may be in the process of proving it, but it is still not true and sharks still kill walruses as we speak so therefor sharks are still the toughest animal over walruses.
Walrus101

Pro

If I must go into this again I will. The walrus has two skills that are clear seen. It is very skilled in the infamous two tusk technique. That means if your a shark, it would be best if you swam in the opposite direction. Walrus are also known to be ninjas. Can your petty shark even hope to stand up to the ninjaness of a walrus? I think not. This wikipedia page shows how bad the walrus are. Are you sure you want your shark to get into this? You may never see them again.

http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Misterscruffles 4 years ago
Misterscruffles
GeorgenewlandWalrus101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: How can you deny the obvious, George?
Vote Placed by jordansshuler 4 years ago
jordansshuler
GeorgenewlandWalrus101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had a more convincing argument, but it wasn't factual at all. Nothing in his source backed up any of his claims.
Vote Placed by Napoleon_Dynamite_915 4 years ago
Napoleon_Dynamite_915
GeorgenewlandWalrus101Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Go Walrus!