The Instigator
Gold5301
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
STALIN
Pro (for)
Winning
22 Points

Are you a human?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
STALIN
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/12/2013 Category: Funny
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,266 times Debate No: 42250
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (11)
Votes (7)

 

Gold5301

Con

You have 5 rounds to prove that you are a human
STALIN

Pro

I am a human [1]

Proof 1: I can type which proves that I have hands.

Proof 2: I can do stuff on DDO which proves that I have a brain.

Proof 3: I can type in english which proves that I can speak a language.

Proof 4: I know how to use a computer. There is no other animal besides a human who can use a computer.

Proof 5: I am a pro which means that I am human. [2]

Proof 6: I eat which proves that I am human.

Proof 7: I am Stalin whichprove that I am human.

Proof 8: I can spam which proves that I am human.


Sources:
http://www.merriam-webster.com...
http://gizmodo.com...
Debate Round No. 1
Gold5301

Con

-How am I not sure that someone is just programming you to do these things?
-You can't prove that you can eat.
-Stalin is dead.
-Robots can be programmed to use computers (destroys proof 2, 4, and 8)
-Robots can also be programmed to learn languages and respond to them.
-Robots can have hands.
Sources
https://www.google.com...
https://www.google.com...
STALIN

Pro

This is how I can prove that I am human. I ask Con to give me a single example of a robot who debates. If he can not do so, then I win this debate.

Also, Con never replied to this argument:

I can debate which means that I have a brain which proves that I am human.

Sources:
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com...
https://indietorrent.org...

Debate Round No. 2
Gold5301

Con

1. You never wrote the evidence in round 2 (I can debate which means that I have a brain which proves that I am human.)
2. Robots can be debating robots in about 3 years
3. If you are going to say that it will take 3 years to make a debating robot(DR), then how am i sure that you might be a robot from the future?
Sourceshttp://www.dailymail.co.uk...
STALIN

Pro

"You never wrote the evidence in round 2"

Yes I did.

"Robots can be debating robots in about 3 years"

No they can't. I have been here 8 months as my profile says.

" If you are going to say that it will take 3 years to make a debating robot(DR), then how am i sure that you might be a robot from the future?"

Because it is still not possible to time travel...duh.



Con has said nothing about the human brain. It is still impossible to attack a human brain to a metal machine. Therefore, it is still impossible...[1]

Con has done nothing to prove that I am human. I have argued that I am human because I can debate and think.

I have nerves and organs and am therefore human.[2]

Con has done a good job, but I have proved that I am human.[3]

Sources:

https://www.humanbrainproject.eu...
http://www.merriam-webster.com...
http://www.newscientist.com...


Debate Round No. 3
Gold5301

Con

Ok
good debate i forfeit
I will look forward to debating with you next time(if we ever get a chance)
Good debate
STALIN

Pro

This was a very good debate. I thank Con for FF.

I ask Con this, did he enjoy the debate?
Debate Round No. 4
Gold5301

Con

Yes, it was fun trying to rebut your counter arguments.
STALIN

Pro

Ok, VOTE FOR ME EVERYBODY!
Debate Round No. 5
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
But even though i forfeit, we can still see the votes and see who wins.
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
Views*
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
This must be popular:
already 57 veiws and my first debate, Wow.
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
Sorry STALIN:
the source is:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk...
Sorry again.
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
Oh never mind.
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
Noticed what
Posted by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
Ye we noticed.
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
Round 1 ended
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
I am still waiting for my opponent to provide his argument
Posted by Gold5301 3 years ago
Gold5301
ummmm so your a robot?
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
Gold5301STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments to Pro because Con forfeited, conduct to con because he forfeited.
Vote Placed by Gs325jcbd 3 years ago
Gs325jcbd
Gold5301STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: this debate is dumb. con gave up.
Vote Placed by Kc.Nycolle 3 years ago
Kc.Nycolle
Gold5301STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro used more sources and did have accurate facts. Likewise, con was able to accurately refute Pro's arguments. Also con did say he was forfeiting so Pro gets conduct
Vote Placed by Josh_b 3 years ago
Josh_b
Gold5301STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: My initial belief was that con is not human. I am not sure how I would have felt about other debaters. Stalin's best argument for being a human was "time travel hasn't been invented yet." So even if he wasn't human, we couldn't know it until time travel was invented.
Vote Placed by AndrewB686 3 years ago
AndrewB686
Gold5301STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con conceded. Stalin is obviously human because no programmer possesses the capabilities of programming a robot to spam and troll as proficiently as he does.
Vote Placed by janetsanders733 3 years ago
janetsanders733
Gold5301STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro showed that he was human and not a robot. Robot's can't function on DDO like STALIN can.
Vote Placed by Mysterious_Stranger 3 years ago
Mysterious_Stranger
Gold5301STALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF