The Instigator
BigRedHog
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
rdub
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

As a whole, is the SEC the strongest conference in collegiate football

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
BigRedHog
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/21/2014 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 641 times Debate No: 63644
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

BigRedHog

Con

The SEC is totally overrated. Just because they won 7 of the past 8 national championships, over the past 15 years have consistently had the most NFL draft picks. (23% of the first 100 players drafted in 2014 were SEC players , and in 2013, the SEC had 63 players selected, 19 more than the Big Ten and Big 12 COMBINED ) they think their players are better than everybody else.

Never mind that the SEC plays a brutally physical brand of football week after week, where tackling ISN'T optional ! They're slow and dull to watch. REAL football is played by the teams with the flashiest uniforms, ie Maryland in the fourteen team Big Ten, or Baylor and West Virginia in the 10 team Big 12, with scores like 85 to 79 in regulation.

And finally, SEC teams like Vanderbilt, Kentucky, or Arkansas, could never compete with schools like , Kansas, Illinois, Purdue, Iowa State, Colorado, Texas Tech, Michigan, or Wake Forest. Those schools are not afraid to play and be crushed by out of conference opponents like those pretenders Alabama, LSU, Auburn, Georgia, and the two Mississippi cream puffs.

The SEC is a PAPER TIGER !
rdub

Pro

sec is better
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by rdub 2 years ago
rdub
sec is strongest
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
BigRedHogrdubTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's argument was more indepth and has better grammar than Pro.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
BigRedHogrdubTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: con gives no arguments at all. It's a miracle--the instigator of a one-round debate wins!!!