The Instigator
paulbrevik
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Kiko700
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Assault Weapons Ban

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
paulbrevik
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/5/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 728 times Debate No: 40041
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

paulbrevik

Con

Some people think that "assault weapons" should be banned. I would like to hear those people's reasoning.
Kiko700

Pro

The laws in the US should be kept as they are, the only change that needs to be made is more extensive background checks. Right now it's too easy to get hold of a gun.

Your constitution grants you access to guns but they should be more strictly regulated.
Debate Round No. 1
paulbrevik

Con

I am not against background checks. The evidence shows that they don't really reduce crime, because they simply deter criminals from licensed gun dealers, but they don't harm anyone. So, might as well. But please read the debate topic before accepting the debate. This is about the assault weapons ban.
Kiko700

Pro

Kiko700 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
paulbrevik

Con

Just FYI, "assault weapons" are nothing more than hunting rifles that look a certain way. They can accept magazines, like almost any other rifle, which means ANY magazine. No gun can only accept low capacity magazines. If a gun can use a magazine, it can use any magazine. They fire at the same rate as any other civilian rifle, because they are NOT military weapons. Militaries use machine guns. Civilians virtually cannot own machine guns. Machine guns are never used in crime in the United States.
Kiko700

Pro

Kiko700 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Kiko700

Pro

I own an AR-15 myself, (well legally it's my cousin's but i bought it with my own money) I keep it at my summer home in Florida. I actually have a bumpfire stock which can somewhat emulate automatic but I know the laws in the US. Im pretty much sure almost every law abiding citizen can agree on more background checks. It will most likely won't do anything, but we can at least try to get wackos away from guns.
Debate Round No. 4
paulbrevik

Con

I'm all for trying, but the evidence just doesn't show they reduce crime. No problem with having them, but they really are just a placebo. I think a better way to discourage mass shootings is first, to encourage media not to publicize the names of the perpetrator, which would take away their motivation to be famous in death, and to get rid of these "gun free zones" which do nothing but attract people wishing to cause great harm.
Kiko700

Pro

Kiko700 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Beverlee 3 years ago
Beverlee
paulbrevikKiko700Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: I did not see arguments supported by premises, just opinion lists. I felt that Con came the closest to forming a traditional argument in favor of his position, which was to challenge an argument that would support an assault weapons ban. Sources would have also helped create a more three dimensional debate here. Conduct for the FF.