The Instigator
correctwingrepublican
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

At age 6 I was born without a face.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/24/2015 Category: Economics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,197 times Debate No: 70620
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

correctwingrepublican

Pro

Yes.
A
R
I
N

H
A
N
S
E
N

2015
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

Vote CON for the following reasons:

(1) PRO had the BOP to prove he was born without a face at age 6. He provides no evidence, and thus does not uphold his BOP.

(2) Born means "brought into existence" (http://tinyurl.com...). He cannot be "born at age 6," because to be 6 is to have been born 6 years ago.

PRO provides no affirmative arguments or definitions, so you must prefer mine. Therefore, you vote to negate.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
correctwingrepublicanResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: BoP fail.
Vote Placed by UndeniableReality 2 years ago
UndeniableReality
correctwingrepublicanResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Logical contradiction (born at age 6?), no argument (deducted conduct for hosting a false debate with no argument and wasting time/space on DDO).
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
correctwingrepublicanResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con used logic and Pro gave no actual backings to his case nor an actual argument.
Vote Placed by YYW 2 years ago
YYW
correctwingrepublicanResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro offered no evidence that he was born without a face. Default to CON.