Atheism vs Anything
Debate Rounds (3)
Round 2 Clash.
Round 3 Clash and Con's closing thoughts.
Atheism- disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
God - a superhuman being or spirit worshiped as having power over nature or human fortunes; a deity.
Deism - the acknowledgment of the existence of a god upon the testimony of reason and of nature and its laws, and the rejection of the possibility of supernatural intervention in human affairs and of special revelation.
Your definition of God also encompasses deity, I will then define my use accordingly.
Deity - divine status, quality, or nature.
Why does the Universe need to have an origin? If you say "everything must have a beginning", then God cannot exist, because God is eternal (i. e., no beginning).
My argument is as follows:
1: Things move from potentiality to actuality.
2: Only an actual motion can convert a potential motion into an actual motion.
3: Nothing can be at once in both actuality and potentiality in the same respect (i.e., if both actual and potential, it is actual in one respect and potential in another).
4: Therefore nothing can move itself.
5: Therefore each thing in motion is moved by something else.
6: The sequence of motion cannot extend ad infinitum.
Therefore, it is necessary to arrive at a first mover.
By your definition of "God" indicating deity and my usage of deity meaning nature. Than I assert that the term "God" means Universe. Therefore, the first mover is the Universe, which uses dark energy and matter to create finite planets and galaxies.
To both of which using the definitions agree upon at the start I have answered in a logical format with no fallacies or rebuttal.
Thanks for the debate! Happy Holidays!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Romanii 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave an actual argument, while Pro just gave a couple of sentences before forfeiting. It was a no-brainer. Con wins.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.