Autocracy is the most stable form of government.
Debate Rounds (5)
The Con may use any necessary measures to argue against me as long it's related. This include examples, data, quotes, etc.
If the Con unintentionally forfeits the round, he may post his argument on the comment, but it has to be before I post my argument.
The Con also has to argue for other types of government that he thinks is the most stable. Such as democracy, etc.
1st round is for acceptance only.
Post any questions on the comment please.
We all have a potential to be leaders - one man cannot lead all. Hell, one man cannot even lead themselves 99% of the time. So what makes you think anyone has the adequate knowledge to communicate with others and lead them as one man? The wisest of man could not even achieve this. What makes you think a tyrant would?
Leading people through fear is not leading - it's blinding.
"The man dies and there is no more leader" What do you mean no more leader? When Stalin died, there was a power struggle and after a brief leadership under Georgy, Nikita became the next leader of USSR. Same goes for DPRK. When Kim Jung il died of heart attack, the leadership simply went to his son, Kim Jung Un.
I'll begin my argument. "It is better to be feared than loved" By Niccolo Machiavelli. This proves to be true. Before Gaddafi's downfall, there was few events but no turmoil that threatened to tear the country apart. After Gaddafi's downfall however, there was protest against the new government. The fight between the loyalist and the new Libyan army, etc.
Though some people think that the dictator is unreliable leaders who pursue their personal ambition, not all dictator is bad.
Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus is my example. He was a Roman dictator who ruled Rome for 2 weeks to fight off the attack from the enemy. After he repelled those attack, he resigned and return to the ordinary life.
Caesar: Though he is bad on the public experience, he was a brilliant leader. He passed several reforms, acts and laws that was good for Roman.
I know that I am using only the Roman dictators, but this is simply to prove that not all dictators is bad. To have a successful country, the country needs a good leader, an undivided country, and orders.
I apologies that my debate sounds childish, English is not my second language and I am a 8th grader.
The Universe does not support autocracy, therefore I do not support autocracy. There's a reason why the Universe gave every animal an ablility to live through its own experience.
"The Universe does not support autocracy" Universe is nothing but a lifeless empty space with few stuff, so this does not make any sense.
"There's a reason why the Universe gave every animal an ability to live through its own experience" What does this has to do with this debate?
Let me also add some Pro about the autocracy. Unlike democracy, autocratic government can makes decision faster, unlike democratic countries, like US. For example, the politician in the US argued for a WEEK about the debt limits before they raised the debt limit. Countries like Syria makes the decision faster. You decided on something? Nobody complains.
The Universe is your governor, sir. You better appreciate what it's done for you. There's far more to the Universe than what meets your ungrateful eye. For an example, the Universe is having sex like us. Look no further than how stars explode like our penises and how black holes absorb the star's seed. Then look at how males react and look at how females are unpredictable and hungry all of the damn time. Convinced you yet?
Dynasty2468 forfeited this round.
Aerogant forfeited this round.
What the the heck does sex has to do with autocracy? THe Con is starting to spew some nonsense. I'll give him...........some times to apologize. "the Universe is having sex like us" Proof? And no, the new stars being form is simply a chemical and physical reaction.
"The Universe is your governor" The Universe is the governor, the dimension the supreme governor (Or God is the the supreme ruler for some people) Not convinced? It's lays right in front of you. Why aren't we flat like pancake, moving and can't jump? Because of dimension. Not convinced you yet? Research a bit more.
Aerogant forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by TrasguTravieso 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||1|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct-Rule breaking. So/Gr.- Fine for an eight grader's foreign language, but it could stand improvement. Argument-Pro first argued from examples of autocratic systems which either worked well our better than what replaced them, not until the mention of the debt limit does he argue that it is better, at no time does he provide compelling evidence of greater stability. This does not fulfill BoP. Con, for his part, might as well not have been arguing. No points.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.