The Instigator
Harbalalism
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
leet4A1
Con (against)
Winning
56 Points

BE PEOPLE UNDER AND OLDER THE AGE OF 55 must die to increase the HUMAN POPULARGS!

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/23/2009 Category: Society
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,183 times Debate No: 9317
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (7)
Votes (8)

 

Harbalalism

Pro

1. RATS ARE PUMPKINS

BE PEOPLE UNDER AND OLDER THE AGE OF 55 must die to increase the HUMAN POPULARGS!
leet4A1

Con

I thank my esteemed opponent for starting this debate, which I feel is a crucial topic of discussion in this day and age. I also commend my opponent for his eloquent treatment of the resolution, and I know I'll get a hard-fought debate out of him.

My opponent is tasked with arguing that everybody under or over the age of 55 should die to increase the population. I am tasked with refutation of said resolution.

I will begin with the resolution title itself. If everybody under or over the age of 55 died, it would not increase the human population, it would reduce it severely.

I will now counter my opponent's (excellent) argument from Round 1:

"RATS ARE PUMPKINS"

Voters, clearly this is incorrect. Even if I were to concede this point to my opponent, it has little if anything to do with the resolution.

I will leave it there for this round, as my brain hurts from thinking so hard.
Debate Round No. 1
Harbalalism

Pro

I would like to thank my slave cough cough.... victim for joining this debate
First I will give random links from Wikipedia to justify my claims then I vill tell you the purpose of your life

http://en.wikipedia.org...
http://en.wikipedia.org...
http://en.wikipedia.org...
http://en.wikipedia.org...
http://en.wikipedia.org...
http://en.wikipedia.org...

The purpose of your life is to go buy a pumpkin from walmart in New Zealand.Then steal a bus and run over White-tailed Antelope Squirrel.Then take its bones and um....... http://www.vhemt.org...
leet4A1

Con

I thank my distinguished opponent for yet another brilliant round. I don't know what compells me to accept such difficult debates with such esteemed opponents, but I suppose I just like to live on the edge.

Now, not only was my opponent's second round the very opposite of funny (sad? melancholy? Dane Cook?), it also had little to do with the resolution. I have nothing to refute, and my Round 1 arguments stand.

I ask that if my opponent can't make his next round at least kind of relevant to the resolution, that he at least make it funny. Thus far, he has failed to do so.
Debate Round No. 2
Harbalalism

Pro

Human PUPULARGS IS TOOO BIG
heres my evidence
http://en.wikipedia.org...
leet4A1

Con

My opponent is not funny. Here's my evidence:

http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 3
Harbalalism

Pro

My ignorant opponent has concluded that if we send the human race into extinction there vould be no humans
The human population would increase by 72.3% percent each year.
leet4A1

Con

My esteemed opponent has made another fruitless attempt at humor. His first round showed some promise, but went downhill when it became apparent my opponent is less funny than cancer.

SOURCES: http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 4
Harbalalism

Pro

One day I was walking down the street I saw an old man.He told me that all humans are useless.they are like a mass that cant be destroyed.I thought how can you destroy the humargs fast enough?

Then it came to me.What if you convince humargs to destroy themselves through breeding!
It all made sense so I went to www.debate.org. And began to preach

NOW LISTEN TO MY WoRDS

THE HARBOLOST BIBLE CHAPTER 1: EBLARG
EZaRCK created the sea of flowing cows in the dessrts of norhtern russia.He created the pig cow sheep.He stoped He need a greater animal!
So EZARCK created the humarg.HUmarg was stupid rat rebellious it eats GRASS.Every five seconds Humargs says MOOOarg
Ezarck took his shock gun from the shed. "I will kill humargs"
But HUMARGS was invincibargs and fough back using his ..... grass
The vines grabed onto EZARCK and killed him.But before he dies he created Sheep blargs to go preach harbalalism
To be continued.....

BLARG
leet4A1

Con

Well voters, not only was my opponent's argument not funny, it was pure crap. [1]

Vote CON.

[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 5
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by DebateSpirit 7 years ago
DebateSpirit
Welcome to debate.org, thank for your crap pro, we appreciate it very much, and I believe you have a very intense amount of hatred to your elderly. So sorry.
Posted by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
Minus one.
Posted by dogparktom 7 years ago
dogparktom
dumb waste of time
Posted by Cerebral_Narcissist 7 years ago
Cerebral_Narcissist
<sigh>
Posted by Alex 7 years ago
Alex
wut
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
Most definitely.
Posted by Charlie_Danger 7 years ago
Charlie_Danger
wow.
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by FormAndTheFormless 7 years ago
FormAndTheFormless
Harbalalismleet4A1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by nonparticipant 7 years ago
nonparticipant
Harbalalismleet4A1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by DebateSpirit 7 years ago
DebateSpirit
Harbalalismleet4A1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by dogparktom 7 years ago
dogparktom
Harbalalismleet4A1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Charlie_Danger 7 years ago
Charlie_Danger
Harbalalismleet4A1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by patsox834 7 years ago
patsox834
Harbalalismleet4A1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by atheistman 7 years ago
atheistman
Harbalalismleet4A1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by JBlake 7 years ago
JBlake
Harbalalismleet4A1Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07