The Instigator
jeevan
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
JBlake
Con (against)
Winning
28 Points

Bad things attract children much faster than good things

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/28/2008 Category: Education
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,069 times Debate No: 5570
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (6)
Votes (4)

 

jeevan

Pro

i agree with this because every child has one feature which is common - BAD THINGS ENTER INTO MIND MUCH FASTER THAN GOOD ONES.
JBlake

Con

Alright, I'll accept the challenge despite not being entirely certain what it is about.

I await my opponent's R2, where I hope he will present his argument.
Debate Round No. 1
jeevan

Pro

jeevan forfeited this round.
JBlake

Con

Unfortunately my opponent forfeited R2 before offering any type of argument at all. Hopefully he will come up with one in R3.
Debate Round No. 2
jeevan

Pro

jeevan forfeited this round.
JBlake

Con

I assure all readers that I am not, nor will I ever be, an ax muderer. For that reason, you should vote for me.
Debate Round No. 3
jeevan

Pro

jeevan forfeited this round.
JBlake

Con

Also, I don't eat puppies. My opponent has a puppy as his avatar in an ovious attempt to tempt me into eating puppies. This I simply will not do, despite its tasty appearance. Because I am not an axe murderer, nor am I a puppy eater, you should vote Con.
Debate Round No. 4
jeevan

Pro

jeevan forfeited this round.
JBlake

Con

Another forfeit, vote con.
Debate Round No. 5
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by funnybrad333 8 years ago
funnybrad333
rofl I can't vote.

im not voiding my right to privacy to go vote bomb
Posted by Robert_Santurri 8 years ago
Robert_Santurri
CON obviously won this debate. For anyone to say that PRO won is either not reading the debate, being sarcastic, or a vote-bomber.
Posted by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
Not to mention that you are a liar, since there is not a single tie vote in the vote demographics. This is clearly a vote bomb. I thought better of you, Brad, despite our ideological differences.
Posted by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
Brad....

My already low opinion of you dropped even lower...
Posted by funnybrad333 8 years ago
funnybrad333
Funnybrad333 - Voting as a member of debate.org

Conduct: PRO - He was the only one to conduct in the manner the debate was designed

Spelling/Grammar - PRO - Obviously showed much better grammar, and used capital letters effectively to portray a deeper meaning

Arguments - PRO - Actually presented arguments that had relation to the resolution, rather than claiming himself as not an ax murderer or puppy eater as CON did, which neither having any pertinence to the resolution at hand

Sources - TIE - Neither debate used sources, and as such neither deserves a win in the source category
Posted by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
Before accepting this, could you be so kind as to let me know what you are talking about? What is the issue? What is the topic? What is your resolution?
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by kohai 6 years ago
kohai
jeevanJBlakeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.
Vote Placed by Robert_Santurri 8 years ago
Robert_Santurri
jeevanJBlakeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
jeevanJBlakeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Zero 8 years ago
Zero
jeevanJBlakeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07