The Instigator
BellumQuodPacis
Pro (for)
Winning
68 Points
The Contender
mandierose113
Con (against)
Losing
11 Points

Banker (the Debate.org user) has poor spelling and grammar

Do you like this debate?NoYes-5
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/10/2009 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,014 times Debate No: 10415
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (13)
Votes (12)

 

BellumQuodPacis

Pro

We will begin debate in round 2.

Good luck to my opponent.

Poor - Extremely horrible.

Spelling - The ability to place letters in the correct order as a dictionary would.

Grammar - To make sense as according to common grade school grammar.
mandierose113

Con

I'm not sure who banker is?? But they might be doing text talk which is very common in people over the Internet or over the phone.
Debate Round No. 1
BellumQuodPacis

Pro

I thank my opponent for accepting the debate at hand, and by accepting, he has also agreed to my definitions.

The resolution is: Banker (the Debate.org user) has poor spelling and grammar

This means I must prove banker (http://www.debate.org...), has poor [1] spelling [2] and grammar [3].

Contention 1: Banker has poor spelling.

In numerous cases, banker fails to spell words at a fifth grade and nonetheless fails to bring his point across as well.

Some examples of this poor spelling are as follows:
Example 1: http://www.debate.org... (Multiple spelling mistakes, as well as grammatical errors)
Example 2: http://www.debate.org... (an entire debate filled with extraordinary examples of grammatical and spelling errors)
Example 3: http://www.debate.org... (See Example 1)
Example 4: http://www.debate.org... (Example 1)
Example 5: http://www.debate.org... (Example 1 again)
Example 6: http://www.debate.org... (...)
Example 7: http://www.debate.org... (...)

If you would like more, I will be happy to provide.

Contention 2: Poor Grammar

See above.

I thank my opponent for this debate.
Please vote PRO/
mandierose113

Con

im so CONFUSED!! thiss is not a good debate. im so sorry

im new at this so this debate is not a good one for me to start out with
Debate Round No. 2
BellumQuodPacis

Pro

Well I apologise. :(

I wish we could have debated better!

Care to debate a moral issue then?
mandierose113

Con

mandierose113 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
BellumQuodPacis

Pro

As expected. I have won. Please vote PRO. All arguments extended.
mandierose113

Con

mandierose113 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
13 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 7 years ago
I-am-a-panda
LOl, CON has poor spelling and grammar....and is a camwhore
Posted by Cherymenthol 7 years ago
Cherymenthol
Apologise really Hypocritical much?

Also it appears as if your opponent is a woman, not the man your refer to her as.
Posted by Alex 7 years ago
Alex
I actually liked your text talk argument, I was hoping you would keep going with it.
Posted by mandierose113 7 years ago
mandierose113
OMG!! i didnt let me finsh my debate it just hit submit by its self!! IM GOING TO LOSE :(
Posted by BellumQuodPacis 7 years ago
BellumQuodPacis
Im honestly rooting for her too. She can totally do it. I left holes in my arguement that she can destroy with one word.
Posted by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
lol, I am rooting for mandierose113. Text talk is a good idea
Posted by mandierose113 7 years ago
mandierose113
HAHA great..i SUCK at this.! lol thanks for the heads up!:D
Posted by mongeese 7 years ago
mongeese
http://www.debate.org...

If you look at his first debate, CON, you'll realize how doomed you are.
Posted by mandierose113 7 years ago
mandierose113
This really is not a very good debate...I'm having a very hard time understanding how this is a good debate.! I'm not sure what to put the down for the Con! so I'm going to either back down or try to do my best but it wont make since!

Thanks for your understanding,

Mandierose113
Posted by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
this is kinda dumb.
12 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Full-forfeit on Con's behalf.
Vote Placed by twin 6 years ago
twin
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Koopin 6 years ago
Koopin
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Johnicle 6 years ago
Johnicle
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by wjmelements 7 years ago
wjmelements
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by InsertNameHere 7 years ago
InsertNameHere
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:24 
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 7 years ago
RoyLatham
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by comoncents 7 years ago
comoncents
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Danielle 7 years ago
Danielle
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Vi_Veri 7 years ago
Vi_Veri
BellumQuodPacismandierose113Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70