Banning guns would cause a fall in gun crime
Debate Rounds (4)
Second Round - Starting arguments, reasoning for position
Third Round - Rebuttals
Fourth Round - Closing arguments/other rebuttals
Now, you claim that banning guns would mean that people smuggle in guns, meaning that there would be no shootings whatsoever, and here is why you are wrong!
Banning guns could be achieved using 3 ground rules;
* Anyone who owns a gun is to be arrested
* Police and security are to give tighter checks in airports to find guns
* Police are to check anyone who looks like they could be holding a gun
These 3 simple rules would be enough to practically eradicate gun violence. And before you say a slippery slope argument like "people would smuggle in guns", then no; the 'bad' people wouldn't have them, because of the stricter rules, and the good people wouldn't carry guns because they would have no plan to anyway.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||5||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro for Con arguing in round 1. Spelling and Grammar goes to Pro due to Con's lack of grammatical skills. Arguments also go Pro.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.