Batman Vs. Ironman
Debate Rounds (3)
*Point 2: Batman has an item called an EMP (Electro-magnetic pulse) grenade. This effectively shuts down any electronics in the area. This would disable Stark's suit and all Batman would have to do was use his acetylene torch to either burn Stark to death or cut him out of the suit in which case Batman would win (see point 1). These are my starting points.
*1. Even with out suits and utility belts and what not, Tony Stark would still win. Tony had implanted directly into his nervous system a suit called the ' bleeding edge armor' Tony can control this suit with his mind, therefore, having a suit on him at all times.
*2. The main iron man suit ( forgive me, the name currently eludes me) can withstand localized EMPs ( EMP grenade being a example) a similar circumstance were this happened was when the winter soldier attempted to use an EMP situated in his mechanical arm to neutralize iron man. The suit responded before the pulse could reach the suit by switching to alternative power sources and blocking all vital energy compartments effectively preventing any damage.
Lt.Harris forfeited this round.
2. Iron Man never fought the winter soldier as far as I remember. I cannot find a single reference with any back up to support that.
3. Batman also has a Energy deflector, created by Fox to deflect energy based attacks, nullifying many of Ironman's weapons. If you want to look at his sniper and missile, batman can easily 1. Call bats and disappear, making his snipers innefective and he can easily move fast enough to prevent Iron Man from getting a lock with his missiles.
labarum forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Christian_Debater 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||3||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct is a tie because of no swearing, etc. Spelling and grammar is a tie because both had bad punctuation. Most convincing arguments goes to Pro. Reason being is how he refuted Con's initial argument, as well as proved moreover that Batman would win. Most reliable sources is a tie because nobody cited anythinhg.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.