Batman never wins a fight against a super hero
Debate Rounds (2)
The reason that Batman would not be ultimately killed by any superhero is because of his ability to adapt. All he must do is derive a weapon from the weakness of the superhero. I'm going to start with Superman. Superman would fall vulnerable to Kryptonite(as most of us know). In Superman Unchained - Issue #2 (otherwise known as "The Fall"), we clearly see a suit Bruce Wayne has made that renders him invisible (via implication) to Superman. Bruce states that "It senses what's being used to detect it and reacts accordingly". He could implement this in his projectile weapons, making them invisible to everything Superman used. He wouldn't know what was coming until it hit him(pardon the pun). I believe that all this combined would be enough to trap Superman, and if need be, kill him. Don't underestimate the Bat.
So that's Superman gone. Who up next?
Please be aware the we are discussing fictional topics, and if we implemented real life, Batman would be the only feasible "superhero" in the eyes of physics. Then again, that is a rather broad statement, so let me rephrase that.
Batman would be the *most* feasible superhero.
legodude123 forfeited this round.
Synergetics forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Better arguments by Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.