"Batman the Dark Knight" was better than "Batman the Dark Knight Rises"
Debate Rounds (4)
2nd round list argument
3rd round rebuttals
4th round further rebuttals
5th round conclusion
Better meaning more desirable, satisfactory, or effective
Any insults or trolling will lead to forfeiture of the debate.
I will be arguing that Batman The Dark Night was better than Batman The Dark Night Rises.
My opponent will be arguing that Batman The Dark Night Rises was better than Batman The Dark Night.
First lets compare villains in the two movies
Bane is first known as a mercenary in the League of Shadows, he seems to pose a serious physical threat to everyone. However, because of his mask, it is also very hard to connect with this character because of his lack of expressions. (Not saying that Tom Hardy is a bad actor though). Also, Bane's motives aren't known at first because Alfred and Bruce just assume that Bane just wants to watch the world burn, HOWEVER there is no evidence to prove that. At the end, Bane's intelligence was kinda undermined when it was revealed that Miranda was revealed that she was the mastermind. It just showed that Miranda was the brains and Bane was just a mindless minion.
She is first portrayed as a side character but her development into the ulterior mastermind in the end saw her grow into a mildly enjoyable character. However, I felt that there was a bit of a jump to escaping to being the woman she was now. Also, her motives felt a bit lacklustre, Miranda blowing up a city just because her father died by the hands of Batman feels slightly bland.
Joker is a well known character in the Batman series and is just known as a psychotic but brilliant villain. He is played by a brilliant actor Heath Ledger and audiences are able to be entertained not by his actions but by his character in general. Joker's motive is clearly portrayed in the opening movie, he just wants to toy with Batman and Gotham city in his web of the plot. There is also an element of mysteriousness about the Joker as no one expected the riveting plot twists created. There's was also a fair amount of detail that was put into his back story. From what we can gather based on the movie alone, we can say that the Joker came from a family that was most likely divorced but he was probably living with his father who was very violent. The Joker also had a wife but then they later divorced.
Harvey Dent/2 face
Harvey Dent is the hero of the citizens praised and has a thing for Rachel. Harvey, like Miranda , felt more like a side character. However, the plot twist into him being plagued with insanity after the death of Rachel made things more interesting. It just shows how your normal citizen who is filled with moral justice and your best friend can quickly turn into your worst enemy hunting down people. Also, he has a signature coin flip execution which added uniqueness to 2 face as a villain.
Comparing story line and actors
Batman the Dark Night Rises story line was fairly lengthy and decent with one last final reveal showing that Miranda was the mastermind and the reference back to Batman Returns was a nice touch. However, as everyone is starring a new cast of actors and characters, it is more difficult to connect to them.
Batman The Dark Night on the other hand was unpredictable, with a slow gradual ending. The characters here are mostly from the first movie with some new characters being introduced such as Harvey and Joker.
IMO the story line in Batman Dark Night was more unpredictable and more thrilling with hospitals being blown up, ships with explosives attached to them with the public given triggers, characters held hostage and escaping prison using your own crew as explosives. However, in Dark Night Rises all that is present is bridges and tunnels exploding + an all out fight with the public and mercenaries.
In "The Dark Knight Rises" he takes it to a whole new level. Nolan blows up the Gotham City Rogue"s football stadium while a game is being played. He destroys every single bridge to the city except the one used to transport goods in for Bane and his followers. He blows up countless other buildings throughout the city using the concrete laced with explosives. And let"s not forget that Bane and the League of Shadow"s have possession of an armed nuclear bomb ready to destroy the entire city at a moment"s notice!
The scale level is raised so much that we see a television broadcast from the President of the United States personally talking to the citizens of Gotham City. We see United States military action. We see Bane and his League of Shadow"s destroy Blackgate prison and free 1,000 of Gotham"s worst criminals while arming them with weapons. Nolan has perfectly pushed the scale meter as far as it can go without breaking while still remaining believable in the world he has created. When it comes to the summer blockbuster scale "The Dark Knight Rises" does just that, rises above "The Dark Knight".
I am not going to lie. Heath Ledger"s masterful performance made the Joker very threatening and very creepy. The last place I would want to be is in a room with him and his knife being told the story of how he got those scars. It was without question the best acting performance in any of Nolan"s Batman movies. However it is also clear to anyone who has seen the movies that Tom Hardy"s bulking and strutting Bane posed much more of a physical threat to Batman than the Joker did. This is evident by their physical appearances and through their fights. Once Batman found where the Joker was in "The Dark Knight", it was game over. Once Batman found where Bane was in "The Dark Knight Rises", it was game over; for Batman"s back.
It is not just the physical threat each villain poses to Batman that I am talking about. It"s the overall public threat level that the villains plan entails. In "The Dark Knight" the Joker himself says it best when he calls himself a "dog chasing cars" when it comes to his plan. He wouldn"t know what to do if he caught them. He even asks Harvey Dent if he looks like a guy with a plan while visiting the newly scarred district attorney in the hospital. And it"s true. While creepy and threatening as a man, the Joker"s plan is not overly threatening to the general public as a whole. He wants to play these games with Batman, forever. He plans and succeeds in killing several high profile members of Gotham City and its police force as pawns in his game. Minus the one boat filled with citizens, the rest of the general public was basically safe. Sure innocent bystanders and Batman copy-cats were killed by the Joker. But for the most part it wasn"t the public"s fight.
This is not the case with "The Dark Knight Rises." Bane kills hundreds of people at the football game and anyone who was unfortunate enough to be on one of the bridges or in one of the buildings when they blew up. Not to mention all the upper class citizens who were ripped from their homes and sentenced by Dr. Crane and the League of Shadow"s to death. Then there is that whole nuclear bomb that would kill every living person in the city lingering around again. When it comes to overall threat level it is once again "The Dark Knight Rises" that outdoes "The Dark Knight."
Batman has been one of the most popular superheroes for decades. One of the fundamental reasons for this is that unlike any other superhero you can think of there is nothing super about Batman at all. He doesn"t garner super agility from being bit by a radioactive spider. He doesn"t have super strength or the ability to fly solely because he is from another planet. He is just a man, flesh and blood. Given the right physical ability and motivation anyone in theory could be Batman. There is something very primal and elemental about the fact he is risking his life day in and day out. At any moment, Batman could die. This is a main reason why Batman is the most relatable of the comic book superheroes. He is vulnerable. He is mortal.
This fascination with Batman"s mortality is evident in the fact that once it was known that "The Dark Knight Rises" was Nolan"s final Batman installment, and that Bane was going to serve as the Caped Crusader"s main adversary, the overriding question on every fan-boy and girl"s mind was will Nolan actually do it? Will he kill Batman? This idea really struck a chord for an obvious reason; it"s never happened before on screen. As we now know it will have to wait for another day and another director"s interpretation of the character. But the fact that he didn"t die in Nolan"s finale doesn"t matter. It"s the basic idea that he could. And during certain parts of "The Dark Knight Rises" it really felt all but certain he would. It is within this mortality concept and its exploration that "The Dark Knight Rises" separates itself from "The Dark Knight."
In "The Dark Knight" Bruce Wayne was fighting the good fight as Batman. He was continuing to try to stop the injustice and the corruption of Gotham City. More importantly he was on top of his game. There was no doubt that Batman would defeat the Joker due to the fact that, as I discussed earlier, the threat level wasn"t quite to that "will he die" plateau that "The Dark Knight Rises" and Bane achieved.
In "The Dark Knight Rises" things took on a completely different feel. Bruce Wayne reluctantly took up his mantle as Batman yet again. He tried to go through the motions as if nothing had changed. Unfortunately for him, a lot had changed. This time it wasn"t the Joker he was going up against. It was Bane. And this time Batman wasn"t at the top of his ability as a crime fighter. He was mentally and physically rusty from not donning his Bat-suit for eight years.
Batman is then literally broken by Bane and thrown into a prison pit never to be seen again. He has to suffer through excruciating pain and recovery as well as some serious self-reflection and soul searching before he fully understand what it would take to come back from this to not only save himself but to save his city. It is the journey we love watching hero"s make.
During this journey Nolan yet again shows his brilliance for story telling by including that five second clip from "Batman Begins." It was such a subtle scene that many average movie goers might have missed it completely. Of course I"m referring to the scene where Bruce"s father is climbing down the well to save Bruce after he fell in. His dad then asks him that so simple yet such a trilogy-defining-question, "why do we fall?" As any fan of Nolan"s Batman movies knows by now, it is so we can learn to pick ourselves back up. That is just what Bruce Wayne does. That is just what Batman does.
Seeing him go through all that and come out on top is what makes Batman captivating to so many fans. It is what helps make "The Dark Knight Rises" truly the best of the Nolan Batman films and yeah, I said it, better than "The Dark Knight."
Although TDKR was all about action and blockbuster scenes, The Dark Night was all about storyline and when audiences compare movies between one with blockbuster scenes and mediocre storyline and one with excellent storyline and mediocre action. Majority will always choose movies with a strong storyline over good action films.
However it is also clear to anyone who has seen the movies that Tom Hardy"s bulking and strutting Bane posed much more of a physical threat to Batman than the Joker did."
I can soundly agree with your statement. Although Bane is a physical threat to everyone he sees ie punching security guards, threatening mercs and breaking batman's back, the Joker is clearly the more superior villain. Batman The Dark Night Rises was all about testing an aging batman to see if his body was still up to the test. However, in Batman The Dark Night, Nolan put more of an emphasis on not Batman's physical body, but on his morals. Joker makes no moves on Batman himself but instead targets innocent citizens because he is purposely wanting to break Batman mentally. Forcing Batman to choose which of his two closest friends to save was ultimately more gripping then Batman realizing that Miranda was the mastermind.
There was no doubt that Batman would defeat the Joker due to the fact that, as I discussed earlier, the threat level wasn't quite to that "will he die" plateau that "The Dark Knight Rises" and Bane achieved.
While The Dark Night Rises was all about whether Batman dies, The Dark Night was all about who else is going to die that is close to Batman. This creates more tension in the film that when Batman is going to die.
It is also good to note that Bane would not kill Batman before Gotham is destroyed. ("Once Gotham has burned, then you have my permission to die" quote from Bane) However, Nolan wouldn't think of destroying Gotham because of the controversy and bitter feeling the audience would be left with if Gotham was destroyed. (AKA Something similar to Mass Effect 3 if you know what I mean...)
hellblazer forfeited this round.
Thus, a conclusion can be drawn that Batman the Dark Night is better than Batman the Dark Night Rises because it has a stronger story line and superior villains.
hellblazer forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||6||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.