The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
FuzzyCatPotato
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

Big ads by Wally World here!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
FuzzyCatPotato
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/12/2014 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 716 times Debate No: 62924
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (2)

 

Max.Wallace

Pro

Wally World, AKA Walmart.

Here making the big bucks, subsidizing our ability to make sense of things.
Look at your sidescreen. freedom does not ring.
Mother T thay aint, and a saint not. for sure
Suck my buttolicus Wally Maximus.
Your pills kill more then they help.
Argue that capitalists in commie garb.

Get up on your podium wally, by golly! C'mon. Walmarters, you must be smarters! Richie pants!
FuzzyCatPotato

Con

Pro states that Walmart has placed large advertisements on Debate.org.

First, Pro must prove that Walmart has placed ads on Debate.org.

Second, Pro must prove that said ads are large.

Because Pro has not done so, Pro is not yet winning the debate.
Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Pro

Tell me what advertisements you see on your screen then, and if you do and prove it, then I will show you the video of my screen. Will that be proof enough? There are no Wally el Marto ads in your country on DDO? Are you calling me a liar? Not me, you are the tyrant.
FuzzyCatPotato

Con

What ads am I seeing?



Apparently I'm in the Adsense group that includes potential retirees and gamers. Lovely.

Please note, I have never called Pro a liar - instead, I have merely stated that Pro has failed to fulfill Pro's burden of proof.

Pro continues to fail to fulfill Pro's burden of proof. As such, the resolution is still negated.
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Pro

Your screen is tailored to your interests by who? The little green men. I fully expect to lose here, and without any regret or remorse I state my observation. I apologize for not being so addicted to technology as to have the focus to utilize screen manipulation, as you have proven yourself to be able.

Go draw a poster.
FuzzyCatPotato

Con

Pro continues to fail to fulfill his burden of proof.

Furthermore, Pro asserts that I have editted my screencapture, without evidence.

REASONS TO VOTE CON

Conduct: Pro has asserted that Con cheated, without proof.

Grammar: In Pro's last speech, "The little green men." is not a sentence.

Arguments: Pro has failed to fulfill his burden of proof throughout this entire debate.

Sources: Con has provided a picture, while Pro has provided no pictures.
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Max.Wallace 3 years ago
Max.Wallace
My opponent uses a litter box called humanity.
Posted by Max.Wallace 3 years ago
Max.Wallace
OH LORD, They just wo't give up! I will go buy some Wally pills tomorrow. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111
Posted by Max.Wallace 3 years ago
Max.Wallace
As I speak, Wally world is bombarding my screen with pharmaceutical suggestions, believe it or not. Sick world, to those that love it.
Posted by Max.Wallace 3 years ago
Max.Wallace
Words mean 1 thing, and a conversation cannot be interpreted by a thesaurus. Keep trying. litter boxer.
Posted by Max.Wallace 3 years ago
Max.Wallace
The sickness of your plurality does not infect me.
Posted by FuzzyCatPotato 3 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
Manipulated = edited.
There's no way to manipulate without editing Windows's Capture program.
Posted by Max.Wallace 3 years ago
Max.Wallace
Total bulltacopooperino! I never said you edited anything! I said you manipulated this program to show your screen capture. What an ayehole you are so.
Posted by Max.Wallace 3 years ago
Max.Wallace
The Walmart ads a a full third of my screen, believe it or not, it matters not one bit.
Posted by Mr.Lee 3 years ago
Mr.Lee
What exactly is the Pro trying to accomplish here? Random Potato???
Posted by Zanomi3 3 years ago
Zanomi3
I'm with Wocambs... I'm not sure what of that rhymed exactly. This is simply complete rambling, not even a debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
Max.WallaceFuzzyCatPotatoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: con did "nothing". Again. "Absolutely nothing". *Sarcasm*
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
Max.WallaceFuzzyCatPotatoTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave proof.