The Instigator
Morinc
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
emospongebob527
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Bigfoot is real.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
emospongebob527
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/26/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,653 times Debate No: 27003
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Morinc

Pro

*I would first like to note this is purely for entertainment. I DO NOT believe in Bigfoot But there is and has always been a fascination with the Sasquatch in me there is evidence that suggest that they do exist.*

1. To truly ban the existence of the Bigfoot one would have had to scour and search every inch of the entire world to prove that a Bigfoot does not exist.
2. Also, researchers all around the world are discovering new species of life every single day.
3. Also, there have been numerous sightings, pictures and even videos that suggest that Bigfoot do exists.

now if you also have a facination with The Sasquatch ( and live in a place where american tv is present) then im sure you have seen "Finding BigFoot" a show on Animal Planet. The show centers around a group of four "BigFooters" named Matt Moneymaker Cliff Barakman James (Bobo) Fray and Ranae Holland.
they go all round north america trying to prove that Bigfoot is real. Now Ranae the only female of the group does not truly believe that Sasquatches do really exist and give a little bit of insight on reality where the other three members are usually certain of the Bigfoot. In every single one of their episodes they have what they believe to be a bigfoot whether it be a "Knock" or a vocalization even one some occasions they catch a figure moving through the woods on the heat sensor or their night vision.

To sum it all up there just isn't enough evidence to prove that Bigfoot don't exist
emospongebob527

Con

1. To truly ban the existence of the Bigfoot one would have had to scour and search every inch of the entire world to prove that a Bigfoot does not exist.

To truly prove the existence of the Bigfoot one would have to scour and search every inch of the entire world to that a Bigfoot does not exist. On a second note, you are presupposing that the Con side must prove Bigfoot does not exist, this is false, they are not making the claim, the Pro side must prove so, the BOP from them remains unfulfilled.

2. Also, researchers all around the world are discovering new species of life every single day.

This is an irrelevant contention.

3. Also, there have been numerous sightings, pictures and even videos that suggest that Bigfoot do exists.


It is crucial that you prove these are authentic.

now if you also have a facination with The Sasquatch ( and live in a place where american tv is present) then im sure you have seen "Finding BigFoot" a show on Animal Planet. The show centers around a group of four "BigFooters" named Matt Moneymaker Cliff Barakman James (Bobo) Fray and Ranae Holland.
they go all round north america trying to prove that Bigfoot is real. Now Ranae the only female of the group does not truly believe that Sasquatches do really exist and give a little bit of insight on reality where the other three members are usually certain of the Bigfoot. In every single one of their episodes they have what they believe to be a bigfoot whether it be a "Knock" or a vocalization even one some occasions they catch a figure moving through the woods on the heat sensor or their night vision.


Lol, see above response.
Debate Round No. 1
Morinc

Pro

Morinc forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Morinc

Pro

Morinc forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Morinc

Pro

Morinc forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by emj32 4 years ago
emj32
Morincemospongebob527Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF