The Instigator
Con (against)
0 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
7 Points

Biological Warfare is harmful and should not be used by anybody.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/21/2011 Category: Science
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,868 times Debate No: 19992
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




Bioweapons can kill any living organism in a very short time. Reasons why bioweapons should not be used by anybody.


I thank my opponent for posting such an interesting topic, and I must oblige to stand on the PRO side of this debate. Before continuing in this debate, the following term must be defined:

Should: used in auxiliary function to express obligation, propriety, or expediency

With this term defined, I can then move on to the iteration of my case--a solitary contention:

Contention 1: Biological warfare is immoral.
Because it causes harm to others and general mass destruction, biological warfare is immoral and should not be used. Anyone who does so is morally reprehensible.

"BIOLOGICAL WARFARE." Internet Dermatology Society. Web. 23 Dec. 2011. <;.

Debate Round No. 1


johncha345 forfeited this round.


Extend all arguments until my opponent posts.
Debate Round No. 2


johncha345 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by ScarletGhost4396 6 years ago
Just a quick question to understand our debate: you're going to be arguing why biological warfare SHOULD be used, correct?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 6 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Well, someone had to vote on this. Pretty much, Pro wins by all accounts...Con's forfeit, awkward sentence structure ("Reasons why bioweapons should not be used by anybody"), in contrast to Pro's case, which included a source--from the Internet Dermatology Society-, makes it clear that Pro won. Moreover, Con's contention was barely legible, and his reasoning that "ioweapons can kill any living organism in a very short time" does not agree with his position--> took the wrong side of the debate