Birthright citizenship should be abolished in the United States
Debate Rounds (3)
People's right to have a son or daughter be a citizen of the US upon birth by default is a good thing in any situation. To have families from outside America move here for a better life opportunity is also beneficial because they will work hard, and their children should also have the chance for a good future.
Immigrants' children will grow up in the US in an environment wherein they can get used to the United States and essentially become Americans. To deny an American their citizenship is improper. Born and raised in America means American; they will learn English and the rules of the society as natural Americans will, and therefore deserve the right to be permanent citizens for their safety and future.
I would like to see an opening statement or some kind of introduction to my opposition's points and arguments as the first round.
The Irish immigrants (caused by the potato famine) in the 1800s increased the population of the North before the civil war. As a result, we saw a huge number of these people joining the army to fight for the north as Americans that wanted to work and risk their lives to be people that we honour. Obviously, the Union won, and the Irish contribution was priceless. Additionally, after the 1850s and 1840s, there were huge amounts of Chinese immigrants to the West (until the ban in the 1880s). They worked hard almost as slaves to get by and to have families that are American heroes and some were abused in unjust ways, but they took it for their families futures. Look at these people now. Some Chinese are still here as respected and successful people. The same applies to all the past immigrants. Now we have an idea of a "melting pot" in the US that represents the immigrants that we let in and became citizens after that amendment from the Reconstruction. This is what America is for.
What harm is done by letting in citizens that want opportunities for better lives? Some say that it takes away people's jobs. However, the people that immigrate can't even get very good jobs, so if they do somehow do that, they won't be attacking the white-collar jobs, and people with blue-collar jobs can get another without excessive strain or difficulty. Besides, we consider them Americans, and overtime, if their children are citizens, we will have a bigger and more powerful nation of people that were born and raised in America and love their country.
So, to address what your rhetorical questions pointed to in your first argument, we should have the amendment viewed as a way to let in people to our country freely because of the universal benefits; "mass immigration" is not necessarily a bad thing (right now).
Not coincidentally the majority of nations which do grant birthright citizenship to the children of illegal aliens are located in Central and South America, including Mexico: Mexico being the nation with the most illegal aliens in America and the most children born on U.S. soil to illegal aliens.
The pejorative moniker placed on these children is "anchor babies" because they anchor the illegal parents to their birthright legitimized children. Each year thousands of pregnant illegal immigrants cross the border into America for the express purpose of having a child born on U.S. soil, to take advantage of this loophole in the Constitution's Fourteenth amendment, put that in your book Mr. boring.
The one important thing is that you failed to address my actual point. All I have heard you say is that there are a lot of illegal aliens in the US and they take advantage of the system. I explained how the immigrants benefit our society, but you stand rigid in asserting that is false and you as a result go on to explain how there are 30 million illegals born here. (By the way, that seems quite excessive; I would like to see a source for that.) Of course our immigrant population is very high, though. You didn't have a problem with it before the Fourteenth Amendment.
By the way, who is immigrating to Mexico for citizenship? You said "the majority of nations which do grant birthright citizenship to the children of illegal aliens are located in Central and South America, including Mexico."
Also, your first paragraph was just an appeal to popularity. I would like yo see you address the fact that immigration is good; explain why it's not a problem, and explain it in ways that I didn't already refute in my previous response. This is unfortunately the last round.
also i never said anyone was immigrating to mexico i just said they allow that there... and its not like people in mexico are ONLY Mexicans or of a Hispanic origin... theres also Caucasians and Asians... now are there a lot that it would be noticed... no... but you talking like only Hispanics are there...
also it was this website that i got that 30mill from -http://www.examiner.com... check it out for yourself if you dont believe me
and you asked me to addres why its illegal immagration is good... well here
Unauthorized immigration is a bellwether of the strength of the economy. Unlike legal immigrants who may have waited years or even decades for a visa, illegal immigrants respond quickly to changes in economic conditions. Inflows rise faster when the economy, especially the construction sector, is growing, and slow down when the economy is shrinking. This turnaround is consistent with other signs that the economy is recovering and that residential construction activity in particular is gaining steam"good news for homeowners.
The possible increase in the unauthorized population is also good news in that it may finally spur the House to pass immigration reform. But it"s critical that the House not use these numbers as a justification for even tougher border security. Economic forces, not border enforcement, drive illegal inflows. The Great Recession played a far bigger role in reducing unauthorized immigration than the tenfold increase in the Border Patrol"s budget over the last decade. The House Homeland Security Committee had the right idea to support a bill that removes last-minute additions to the Senate bill that double the number of Border Patrol agents along the U.S.-Mexico border and expand the fence.
Instead, the House should focus on addressing the fundamental factor that motivates most illegal immigration: jobs. Employers turn to undocumented immigrants because current immigration policy makes it impossible to bring in foreign workers quickly and legally when employers can"t find Americans to fill jobs. The current H-2A and H-2B temporary foreign worker programs require planning months in advance and following complicated rules. It"s far easier to hire an unauthorized immigrant.
Unauthorized immigrants have become a safety valve for the U.S. economy: they enter in greater numbers when needed, and they go where the jobs are. Their arrival in greater numbers is good news indeed. But sensible immigration reform that reduces the supply of and demand for unauthorized immigrants and admits more highly skilled immigrants would be even better news.
-(http://www.forbes.com...) so you dont complain were i get my sources from
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.