The Instigator
Saracen1337
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Apollo.11
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Bitches be bitchin'

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Apollo.11
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/4/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,561 times Debate No: 22559
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Saracen1337

Pro

I Believe no matter the cirumstances, that as long as humans walk the earth, that Bitches be Bitchin'.

Con will argue that bitches will not be bitchin.

The term is defined as the following: The idea that the collective of Bitches will always/have always been Bitching

1st round acceptance
Apollo.11

Con

I accept.

Definitions:

bitch: "a female dog, wolf, fox, or otter." [1]

to bitch: "[to] make spitefully critical comments." [1]

BOP:

We'll share the BOP.

I will be arguing that female otters have not always comlained at every point in the past, nor will they always complain at every point in the future.


Sources:

1. http://oxforddictionaries.com...;
Debate Round No. 1
Saracen1337

Pro

Thanks to my opponent for accepting. This ought to be an interesting debate. :)

Firstly this little peace of information from the #1 most reliable source on the internet:Otters live up to 16 years..Otters are playful animals and appear to engage in various behaviors for sheer enjoyment. I quote "...engage in various behaviors for SHEER ENJOYMENT" [1]

This clearly indicates that otters, or more specifically bitches, indulge in activities for sheer entertainment, we can concluded therefore that otters are actually crack-whores. Not only do they live only to the age of 16, the previous quote indicates that they engage in drug-driven sexual activities, much like a crack-whore. Furthermore in the Harry Potter series of books designed to cause hallucinations in adolescent teenagers, the character Hermoine's Patronus spell takes the form on an otter. Any open-minded individual would see hermoine as a crack-whore herself, who also indulges in the act of snorting paracetamol hidden in her books, which is where she obtains her vast imaginative and intellectual abilities.The link between her and her patronus can not be ignored and further emphasizes the fact that Otters/bitches are crack-whores.

Now to the point: I have stated and proven the Otters are indeed crack-whores. Crack-whores have not in one point in our past positively contributed to society, they are constantly bitching about their lack of cocaine to fuel their addictions, as well as their impregnated stomachs effect on their physical appearance.

So a summary of my findings, that con shall rebut:

1-Otters/Bitches are indeed crack-whores
2-The common knowledge that crackwhores constantly "make spitefully critical comments."
3-Bitches therefore, be Bitching.

I thank my opponent for taking time to read this, and look forward to you reply :D

Sources: [1]http://en.wikipedia.org...
Apollo.11

Con


Rebuttals:



My Opponent's Argument #1:



P1. Otters engage in activities for shear enjoyment


P2. Activities engaged in solely for shear enjoyment are examples of making spiteful comments (bitching).



Therefore, otters make spiteful comments (bitch).



Premise 1


I will concede to my opponent Premise 1.



Premise 2


My opponent has given NO JUSTIFICATION for this premise. Thus, the conclusion is false.


Otters cannot even speak, let alone make spiteful comments. [1]



My opponent has a lot of justifying to do.






My Opponent's Argument #2:



P1. Hermoine from Harry Potter exists.


P2. Hermoine is her patronus.


P3. Hermoine's patronus is an otter.


P4. Hermoine is a crack-whore.


P5. Crack-whores complain about society.


P6. Complaining about society is bitching.



Therefore, otters bitch.



Despite not justifying Premise 1, Premise 2, Premise 4, Premise 5, I simply cannot argue with that logic (sarcasm for the voters).





My Case:



Resolution:


Female otters have not always made spiteful comments at every point in the past, nor will they always make spiteful comments at every point in the future.



Argument from Existence



P1. Otters have not always existed.


P2. Otters can only conceivably bitch if they exist.



Therefore, otters cannot have always bitched.



Premise 1


Mustelids (family otters are in) have only existed for 40 million years. [2]



Premise 2


Self-evident.



Argument from Ability



P1. Otters cannot bitch



Therefore, otters cannot bitch



Premise 1


See above. [1]




Sources:


1. http://en.wikipedia.org...


2. http://en.wikipedia.org...


Debate Round No. 2
Saracen1337

Pro

Saracen1337 forfeited this round.
Apollo.11

Con

Alright then…
Debate Round No. 3
Saracen1337

Pro

Saracen1337 forfeited this round.
Apollo.11

Con

OK....

Well, here are some Brandon Wright Highlights:

1. Mid-air hand switch windmill dunk.

2. Two-handed charging dunk.

3. "Shut it down!"

THE BEST ONE THIS SEASON:
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
the space between every line hurts my eyes. Make paragraphs :P
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
Saracen1337Apollo.11Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF