Black ops 1 better then black ops 2
Debate Rounds (3)
This is a highly subjective topic. Therefore, it is up to personal belief. Black Ops 1 is neither universally better or worse than Black Ops 2. The word "better" cannot be given an objective definition.
Your argument again shows your sibjective attitude towards this debate. A "better gun" is not objective. What is a better gun? One that is more accruate? One with a faster rate of fire? One with more velocity? One with more ammunition? One that looks better? One that fires slower? One that fires water rather than bullets? To a pacifist, a better gun might be a non-existant gun. "Better gun" means different things to different people.
Again, faster reaction time does not necessarily mean that it is a better video game. Better is dependant upon the viewpoint of those using it. To some players, slower reaction time may give them an advantage. Although you might beleive that Black Ops 1 is the better of the two, not all agree with you.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Gaurdian_Rock 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Actually had an argument
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.