The Instigator
martimm6776
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

Bonnie is better than Foxy

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/12/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 661 times Debate No: 71582
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

martimm6776

Pro

Bonnie is better than Foxy mainly because of his route and the way he moves.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

I accept. The full burden of proof falls on PRO to prove that Bonnie is better than Foxy. If, by the end of this debate, you are unsure or PRO has failed to establish this resolution, I win by default.

Let me spell out PRO's burden with variables.

Bonnie = X
Foxy = Y

PRO must prove objectively that X > Y

If, by the end of the debate, I have either proven that X = Y, that Y > X, or that these are still plausible options (i.e., PRO has not disproved them or established that only X > Y is true), you're voting for me by default. You'll note, also, that I do need to establish either of these to be the case in order to win, but only to refute PRO's argumnts.

In order to establish objctively that X > Y, PRO must also fulfill the following:

P1) If X possess A, B, and C qualities, it is objectively superior to Y
P2) X possesses A, B, and C qualities
C1) Therefore, X is objectively superior to Y

In other words, he need only needs to prove and to evidence his position as well as his assertions, but he needs to establish an objective framework for comparison--otherwise, comparison of quality, of tastes, of preferences are inherently subjective, and we cannot make objective comparisons, in which case PRO would have failed to uphold his burden of proof and you vote CON.


PRO states, "Bonnie is better than Foxy mainly because of his route and the way he moves."

He does not evidence this position or explain how this can make one superior to the other. This is nothing more than a subjective opinion and, thus, cannot establish the resolution.

Back to PRO.
Debate Round No. 1
martimm6776

Pro

martimm6776 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
martimm6776

Pro

martimm6776 forfeited this round.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

Vote CON.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by ResponsiblyIrresponsible 1 year ago
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
That's the point, dipsh1t.
Posted by Daffa8799 1 year ago
Daffa8799
lol, don't take this debate too seriously
Posted by beachgirl67 1 year ago
beachgirl67
I think Foxy is better than Bonnie because Foxy runs down the hall and if you don't check on pirates cove he can come without warning. At least you can see if Bonnie is there by checking the door light.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 1 year ago
Blade-of-Truth
martimm6776ResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Con. Pro forfeited a majority of the rounds in this debate, which is rarely acceptable conduct. S&G - Tie. Both had proper spelling and grammar. Arguments - Con. Pro failed to maintain his BOP by forfeiting his round, in doing so, he left Con with nothing to rebut and thus Con wins by default. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.
Vote Placed by Lee001 1 year ago
Lee001
martimm6776ResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by That1User 1 year ago
That1User
martimm6776ResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to fufill his/her BoP and forfeited Round 2 and Round 3. Thus, con wins.