The Instigator
FunkeeMonk91
Pro (for)
Winning
18 Points
The Contender
malaki
Con (against)
Losing
6 Points

Boxers Are Better Than Briefs

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/8/2008 Category: Society
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 8,025 times Debate No: 1555
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (5)
Votes (8)

 

FunkeeMonk91

Pro

Since the dawn of man, boxers have reigned supreme in the world of underwear. Here's why:

1. More comfort. Boxers are nonrestrictive, and as a result, more comfortable. The separated legs also allow more flexibility and leave more room for my junk.

2. Cool designs. Boxers come in plaid, polka dots, tie-dye, and every other design you could possibly imagine. When designs are on briefs, it looks like Pull-ups.

3. No resemblance to Pull-ups. Briefs remind me of the diaper days. I don't want to feel like I'm wearing a diaper. When people see you in boxers, they think, "Hey, that guy must be potty trained." It's a pretty good feeling.

4. Airy. Boxers have open legs which are perfect for hot weather (I live in AZ). I can be sweating like crazy but still have plenty of ventilation.

5. Higher sperm count. Tight clothes can lessen your sperm count; not a problem with boxers.

6. Warmth. Boxers also come in a boxer-brief option (the word "brief" is totally irrelevant; boxer-briefs are merely tight boxers). This can keep any guy warm during the cold seasons.
malaki

Con

Alright pretty serious debate here so lets hope it goes well.

First I will refute your arguments then make my own.

1)When one has a large and dropped package boxers cause one to sit on ones nuts and penis, this is not comfortable, especially when you have a tendency to just flop onto chairs, furthers more boxers force the wear to constantly adjust while briefs you can just stick it how you like it and go. Simply strong holds are better.

2)Their are some cool designs at some malls, the graffiti looks good. Particularly I like the brown strip in the back look, very classy. Whats more is only sissy men want pretty underwear, pirates are jsut like f*ck it holds my cock its good.

3)You can still have accidents in boxers, more so if you sit on your package.

4) The other feelings you get from briefs are just as good, the tight hold gives your shaft the impression of getting hand.

5)There are too many children in the world anyway

6) boxer briefs are just over sized briefs therefore this argument is pro brief.

Reasons to wear briefs are as follows;

1) Proper control, no genital based anarchy in my pants
2) more manly
3) properly conceals boners, even enhances feeling
4) They are cheap
Debate Round No. 1
FunkeeMonk91

Pro

I can see you are a worthy opponent. I should have made this more than 2 rounds. First I will refute your refutings. Then, I will refute your arguments.

1. For well-endowed wearers, such as myself, this is not a problem. In all my years, I have never accidentally sat on my wang. And I would actually argue the opposite, that you have to adjust with briefs. Because in boxers, your junk is always free to move. Therefor, if you are in an awkward position, you can just move over a little, and you will automatically be in a new position. With briefs, you are committed to that one position for as long as you wear underwear. I can't even bear to imagine the shear uncomfortability of this concept.

2. Dude, all of the sweetest designs are on boxers. On briefs, you got three choices: white, single-colored, or teenage mutant ninja turtle patterns. It is designs like the third option that remind me of Pull-ups. Maybe it's just me, but I do not want to revisit my diaper days. I don't want pretty underwear, I just want to look damn good.

4. Are you telling me that you get the same feeling of ventilation in briefs? That is outrageous! Boxers are the closest thing to streaking while still wearing clothes.

5. But with no sperm you can sell it to a sperm bank. Without sperm, I would not have enough money for groceries or rent. Sperm is my livelihood.

6. The definition of boxers are underwear with long legs. The definition of briefs is underwear with no legs. Therefore, boxer-briefs cannot be briefs because they have legs.

Now to refute your arguments:

1. Briefs have too much control. It's like a kung fu grip on my wang. Don't think of it as anarchy. Think of it as eternal bliss.

2. Oh yeah, briefs are so manly that girls wear the same damn things. The only thing that is different is the name. WAKE UP! PANTIES AND BRIEFS ARE ONE AND THE SAME!!

3. You got me there, bro.

4. Boxers are the underwear of nobility. Commoners aren't allowed to wear them, that's why they're so expensive.

Boxers are the best, for obvious reasons. But I just thought of one more: you can easily take them off without taking off your shoes. I don't know why you would ever want to do that, but you could if you wanted.
malaki

Con

malaki forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by mindjob 9 years ago
mindjob
They are very constricting. And as for the enhancing the feeling when you have a boner in briefs, I have to disagree. One must be mindful of getting chaffed in the worst of areas when they have a boner in briefs. Chaffing on your German helmet over time will only decrease feeling.
Posted by shelbih 9 years ago
shelbih
didnt mean to put it twice. sorry computer froze :[
Posted by shelbih 9 years ago
shelbih
boxers are sexy as hell.
it would seem to me that briefs would me constriciting? and tight?
i wouldn't know though, because i have never worn briefs...
:]
Posted by shelbih 9 years ago
shelbih
boxers are sexy as hell.
it would seem to me that briefs would me constriciting? and tight?
i wouldn't know though, because i have never worn briefs...
:]
Posted by NapoleonofNerds 9 years ago
NapoleonofNerds
This is perhaps the most brilliant and important resolution on the entire site.
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by Alessia_Riddle 8 years ago
Alessia_Riddle
FunkeeMonk91malakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by FunkeeMonk91 9 years ago
FunkeeMonk91
FunkeeMonk91malakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by stevster 9 years ago
stevster
FunkeeMonk91malakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by A-ROD 9 years ago
A-ROD
FunkeeMonk91malakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
FunkeeMonk91malakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by mmadderom 9 years ago
mmadderom
FunkeeMonk91malakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by mindjob 9 years ago
mindjob
FunkeeMonk91malakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by izzyg413 9 years ago
izzyg413
FunkeeMonk91malakiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30