The Instigator
Riggs
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
philochristos
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points

Boxers of Briefs?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
philochristos
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/12/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,549 times Debate No: 28140
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (6)

 

Riggs

Pro

Very simple and short debate (also my first one) I will be debating for boxers, my opponent for briefs.
I believe boxers are a superior choice over briefs for the following reasons:
They have a more diverse material selection for the wearer's comfort.
Boxers allow for more freedom and keep the "area" nice and cool.
Tighty Whiteys are NOT cool (not saying you show your underwear to everyone).
Women generally find men sexier that wear boxers.
Less skid marks :)
Thanks for reading,
GO BOXERS!
philochristos

Con

Briefs: (1) less expensive, (2) better support, (3) stretchier; more comfortable, (4) don't scrunch up when you put your pants on (5) don't pinch your jewels when you sit, and (6) prevent your junk from sticking to your leg.

Boxers: (1) materials less comfortable, (2) "freedom" is a euphemism for "unsupported," (3) "Tighty whities" is a misnomer; briefs come in a variety of colours, (4) confidence is sexy, and it takes confidence to wear briefs, and (5) just keep your butt clean.



Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by wrichcirw 4 years ago
wrichcirw
1) I wear boxers
2) Impossible for PRO to win a 1 round debate
3) 1 point to PRO, welcome to the website.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by blackfirewolf 4 years ago
blackfirewolf
RiggsphilochristosTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had a more convincing argument. And this not biased as I'm a girl and I don't wear boxers. :)
Vote Placed by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
RiggsphilochristosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro Rightfully points out that boxers offer more freedom, Con puts up an argument that Briefs do not pinch your crown jewles, Although this is not rebutted by pro because its a one round debate, I feel Con has argued wrongfully. Boxers offer more breathing space or freedom, as pointed out by Pro. Silly debate.
Vote Placed by The_Master_Riddler 4 years ago
The_Master_Riddler
RiggsphilochristosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con "con"vinced me with his "con"vincing arguments
Vote Placed by socialpinko 4 years ago
socialpinko
RiggsphilochristosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: This one was a real nail-biter. Now Con gets conduct right off the bat seeing as Pro (by instituting a one round debate) precluded counter-refutations or serious discussion on the topic. On the arguments themselves, it's hard not to give Con arguments right off the bat since Pro has no chance to either counter Con's points or to defend his own. This wasn't an unlucky turn of events for Pro, but the necessary result of only putting in one round.
Vote Placed by wrichcirw 4 years ago
wrichcirw
RiggsphilochristosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: see comment
Vote Placed by GorefordMaximillion 4 years ago
GorefordMaximillion
RiggsphilochristosTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pros arguments rebutted. And I don't wear underwear so I'm not biased.