The Instigator
Pro (for)
7 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Bryan Mullins: The Roast Game, Families were eating their own children for 19 years

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/20/2017 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 8 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,418 times Debate No: 104488
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (173)
Votes (1)




The Roast Game is pretty simple
" First ask any family member "what is special about a holiday roast?"
The family member would have the tendency to guess assumptively
You say "no" to the family member
Then you ask them "who or what do you think is special?"
The family member says "I believe that children are special"
You respond "So, you eat children for a Christmas roast?"
The family member would freak out at you because he knew that the family ate children and he is surprised that you knew it too.

The whole point of the game is to get your point across, which is the idea that the family eats children as their Christmas roast, and you interview and prove your common knowing and realizing of the idea or tradition that families have.
If they freak out, they already admitted it.

The Roast Game - Bryan Mullins and The International Wine Club Orchestra:


I literally have no clue what this is supposed to be about. Nothing that the person who is "pro (for)" this posted makes any sense to me nor the person who attempted to explain it to me.

That's that. Oops.
Debate Round No. 1


It does make sense but you don't understand it.
It's a psychological will tester, testing their will to tell the truth
Like asking them "What is special about a holiday roast?"
And them guessing as a response "ham, chicken, turkey, beef"
You tell them "No" because they don't realize the point you're trying to get across their heads
Because they think they can get away with eating children, but suddenly you ask them another question like "Who or what do you think is special?" then they answer with this response "Children" and believing that "Children are special" which you respond to that with "So, you guys eat children as your christmas roast." Which gets them to freak out.
This whole topic is about getting your whole point across and at the same time, province the truth in which I did with that long comment I made in the comment section below.

I made my point clear, so vote for Pro!


You know what? This was a pointless, confusing, stupid debate and I don't honestly care if I lose. There. I said it.
Debate Round No. 2
173 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Cherrypalm 4 months ago
I didn't, I just close that account because you kept attacking me and annoying me. Even when I blocked messages from you. You kept sending me messages. You were so annoying.

This website is so anti-free speech. I thought I am getting temp-banned for using racial slurs (freedom of speech).
Posted by KwLm 4 months ago
what overwhelming majority? You didn't get a single vote in the debate: I'll remind you

You also deactivated your account and cried like a child after you were proven wrong.
Posted by Cherrypalm 4 months ago
This is 100% serious, literal, and fact because everyone by an overwhelming majority agrees upon The Roast Game as Fact.
Posted by Cherrypalm 4 months ago
KwLm is a retarded 13 year old still in school.
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 5 months ago
The Roast Game is Still Fact!!!
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 5 months ago
You are a screeching retard.
Posted by KwLm 5 months ago
Bryan Mullins people, proving the he himself is a liar.
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 5 months ago
Hello again!
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 5 months ago
Goodbye DDO!

The Roast Game is FACT!
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 5 months ago
You have proven nothing. I just refused to debate with a hypocrite who disagrees so much, that he can't get his head out of his a*s.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by JimShady 8 months ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Basically a forfeit... I mean, she said she doesn't care if she loses....