The Instigator
Dante1
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Chicken
Con (against)
Winning
20 Points

Bullying will never end!!!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Chicken
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/14/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,361 times Debate No: 32485
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (4)

 

Dante1

Pro

- Since the era of cave men bullying has been going on
- The bullying debate has been going on for years and kids are still getting bulliedmwhether its online, at school, etc.
- What measures have been proposed that will ACTUALLY prevent bullying? I dont knowmof any
Chicken

Con

Hello everyone, It is I, Chicken!

Before we begin, I see it fit to define a few terms:

Bully- one habitually cruel to others who are weaker [1]
Bullying- the act of being cruel to others [1]
Never- not ever [2]
End- the point where something ceases to exist [3]

Observation 1- Pro clearly is referring to human beings, this is shown through the example of cave MEN.

Now onto the Con Case-

1) Bullying WILL end, when humanity goes extinct.

Sub Point A- The Sun's Collapse
The exact rate point at which we may go extinct is unknown. But it has been confirmed humanity WILL go extinct, through a number of different ways. Most notably, the sun dying in about 7.6 Billion Years [4].

Sub Point B- The Age of Nuclear Conflict
Even a regional nuclear war can lead to the extinction of humanity, and thus an end to bullying. [5]

Sub Point C- The Asteroid AG5 will hit earth in 2040 and has a chance to cause extinction
Asteroids the size of AG5 easily have the potential to destroy all human life, just as a similar asteroid in theory hit earth to cause the extinction of the Dinosaurs. Should AG5 make a full on collision with the earth, it could easily cause the end of the world, leaving only dust and smoke clouds in its wake, where only some bacteria survived, just as we saw through the dinosaurs. [6]

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
[2] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
[3] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
[4] http://www.thetechherald.com...;
[5] http://www.nucleardarkness.org...
[6] http://science.howstuffworks.com...;

I await Pros Case.
Debate Round No. 1
Dante1

Pro

Dante1 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Dante1

Pro

Dante1 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by MyzticStrike 4 years ago
MyzticStrike
I lolled.
Posted by imabench 4 years ago
imabench
Well played chicken, well played

*Stamps debate with the Imabench troll seal of approval*
Posted by glassplotful 4 years ago
glassplotful
It would be best to define bullying first. If I agree to your definition and see that the opposite argument is arguable, I may take up your debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by 1Devilsadvocate 4 years ago
1Devilsadvocate
Dante1ChickenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: F.F.
Vote Placed by Pennington 4 years ago
Pennington
Dante1ChickenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 4 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
Dante1ChickenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Only Con presented arguments while Pro forfeited. Con's arguments were fun to read.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 4 years ago
Ragnar
Dante1ChickenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't like that chicken used schematics 'well the universe will end,' however pro forfeited every round giving con conduct. Con made an argument, pro did not. Spelling errors too minor to warrant the point. Sources seemed in line with con's argument.