The Instigator
batman
Pro (for)
Losing
21 Points
The Contender
Miserlou
Con (against)
Winning
84 Points

CHUCK NORRIS IS ONE OF THE MOST AMAZING PEOPLE IN THE WORLD.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/6/2008 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,380 times Debate No: 1454
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (10)
Votes (35)

 

batman

Pro

OF COUSE CHUCK NORRIS IS ONE OF THE MOST AMAZING PEOPLE IN THE WORLD TO SAY ANYTHING DIFFERENT WOULD BE AN ILL CONCIEVED NOTION. AS EVIDENCE I GIVE YOU THE FOLLOWING ARGUEMENTS
ALL MOST EVERYONE KNOWS HIS NAME
HE HAS JOKES ABOUT HIM THAT DO NOT ATTACK HIM
IF YOU SAY HE ISN'T HE WILL ROUND HOUSE KICK YOU IN THE FACE

FOR THESE REASONS AND MANY MANY MORE I URGE A VOTE OF PRO IN TODAYS DEBATE.
Miserlou

Con

Ah, Chuck Norris. Alas I must contend with you; I have seen far more amazing people than Chuck Norris, and I believe him in fact to be rather un-amazing.

Let's break down your arguments:

"ALL MOST EVERYONE KNOWS HIS NAME"
Almost everyone knows a lot of peoples' names. Just because someone is well known doesn't mean that they're "amazing". Paris Hilton for example is famous, but I wouldn't call her an amazing woman, in fact she's pretty close to the opposite. And since I assume you mean amazing in a positive sense, then you have to look at infamous people. Dictators, tyrants, murderers: there are tons of well known villains in the world (i.e. Hitler or Charles Manson), and they rarely come with and positive adjectives.

"HE HAS JOKES ABOUT HIM THAT DO NOT ATTACK HIM"
Also not a sign of being particularly amazing. Anyone can be in a joke. And it was always my interpretation that most of those jokes are pure sarcasm. I can't think of anyone who cracks those jokes who is also a Chuck Norris fan. What they attack is Chuck's macho persona by making it absurd.

"IF YOU SAY HE ISN'T HE WILL ROUND HOUSE KICK YOU IN THE FACE"
I am not afraid.

It may be true that Chuck Norris once beat a brick wall at tennis, but that's pretty much been his only accomplishment. Vote con.
Debate Round No. 1
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by batman 8 years ago
batman
stupid faces
Posted by TJBric 9 years ago
TJBric
I feel obligated to point out that the internet phenomena of the Chuck Norris joke actually started out as Vin Diesel jokes. The basic premise of exaggeration stayed the same, and even several of the jokes are direct lifts of the Vin version just with Chuck's name placed in them. If I recall correctly the same site went on to make Steven Seagal jokes.
Posted by Pluto2493 9 years ago
Pluto2493
When Chuck Norris does push ups, he isn't pushing himself up, he's pushing the earth down.

When Chuck Norris goes into water, he doesn't get wet, the water gets chucked.

When the Boogeyman goes to bed every night he checks his closet for Chuck Norris.

Chuck Norris once ordered a Big Mac at Burger King. And he got one.

Chuck Norris counted to infinity. Twice.

Chuck Norris can lead a horse to water AND make it drink.

Chuck Norris can have is cake and eat it too. And then he'll eat yours.

Chuck Norris once one $1,000,000 in a poker tournament with a two of hearts, seven of clubs, the Old Maid, Rules on how to play Texas Hold'em, and a wild card from the game of UNO.

Chuck Norris can divide by Zero.

When God said, "Let there be light" Chuck Norris said, "Say please."
Posted by Miserlou 9 years ago
Miserlou
I was bored, saw that it was one round and decided to take it. Pointless as it was it entertained me for a good five minutes.
Posted by michael_no_winning 9 years ago
michael_no_winning
1 round debate? what did you expect?

with no good points, either! he made a debate for fun and then wasn't prepared to respond to anything. loss. definitely a loss.
Posted by batman_is_dumb 9 years ago
batman_is_dumb
6-19 says it all. A pointless debate, though thankfully it was only one round... A horribly structured argument... ALL CAPS, TOO...

Honestly, Miserlou probably could have dropped the round and I would have voted for her anyway...

Besides that, I'm pretty sure batman is a spammer, and so would vote against him on principle.
Posted by Miserlou 9 years ago
Miserlou
Ignoring the ludicrousness, ignorance, and offense of that statement, Chuck is not my type.
Posted by batman 9 years ago
batman
ARE YOU GOING TO R@PE HIM YOU SOUND EXCITED.
Posted by Miserlou 9 years ago
Miserlou
If Chuck Norris wants to come to my house that's fine, but don't say I didn't warn him.
Posted by batman 9 years ago
batman
CHUCK NORRIS JNOWS WHERE YOU LIVE MISERLOU,HE WILL GET YOU MARK MY WORDS.
35 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by kvaughan 9 years ago
kvaughan
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Pricetag 9 years ago
Pricetag
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by TJBric 9 years ago
TJBric
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by dabigdood 9 years ago
dabigdood
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Loofa 9 years ago
Loofa
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Cindela 9 years ago
Cindela
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by VantagePoint 9 years ago
VantagePoint
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by theaceb 9 years ago
theaceb
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by ScrewSociety62 9 years ago
ScrewSociety62
batmanMiserlouTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03