COD is better then Halo
Debate Rounds (2)
So you state that "Halo is just getting boring to be honest all you do through the game is just fight aliens". Well, in the campaign you do fight aliens. Whether it be Halo , Halo 2, etc. They all fight aliens or just some form of intelligent life. But why is it boring? You fight in the future, giving the player the experience that they will never experience in his/her lifetime because these things won't happen. You fight as one of the remaining KNOWN Spartans that are alive.
For multiplayer, you said that "in COD its amazing going around doing different things in Halo's multi its not as fun either". Both have almost equal number of game types so you should have A LOT of things to do including Halo's sub-campaign called Spartan Ops which is kind of like Ghosts Extinction game to the point of doing something else than multiplayer. More importantly, i think Halo has a more strategic game play to it than you think. COD provides you the weapons. You are able to customize your loadout for better control of the map whether it be close range or long range. On the other hand, Halo does the same thing but there are weapons on the map providing a more strategic play of conquest. Making players remember, spawn times on each weapon and if your conquest is done correctly, you are able to take the enemy weapons like maybe a sniper or maybe the Rocket Launcher. Each game are fast pace games so you do have to be on the ball.
I will provide multiple sites to see where each game stands, recent game Halo 4 and CoD:Ghost, on critic reviews.
Halo 4 CoD:Ghosts
Metacritic 87 metascore 73 metascore
GameStop 8.7/10 review 5.4/10 review
TrustedReviews 9/10 review 7/10 review
WoozyPoozy forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Dishoungh 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con may had the better argument, but he forfeited at the last round. I can't really let that slide. For his forfeit, he shouldn't get points for making the better arguments. Never forfeit from a debate no matter what. Yes, I suck at voting, but it's not fair for Pro to still lose even though her opponent forfeited in a round.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.