The Instigator
catanton
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TeddyKyle
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

Caii din delta ar trebui salvati

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/22/2011 Category: Politics
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,550 times Debate No: 16628
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (2)

 

catanton

Pro

Masacrarea cailor din Delta Dunarii nu este o solutie pentru a rezolv situatia de acolo. Personal, sunt de parere ca exista si alte solutii, una dinre acestea fiind relocarea lor catre alte zone.
TeddyKyle

Con


沉冰

  “整整六十年前,也就是1939年,钱锺书先生教我《大一英文》
的时候,全班只有我一个人是来自外文系的学生。”许渊冲教授不无
自豪地回忆起他在西南联合大学就读的那一段日子。他说:“我最感
幸运的是,在西南联大这所一流学府中遇见了20世纪中国文、理学科
的两位大师:钱锺书和杨振宁。钱锺书先生对中西文化了解之深、涉
猎之广,即使放在全世界范围内加以考察,也是首屈一指的。”以下
便是沉冰与许渊冲教授之间的问答录。摘自《不一样的记忆——与钱
锺书在一起》,沉冰主编,当代世界出版社1999年8月出版。

沉冰:据说钱锺书先生曾发“叶公超太懒,吴宓太笨,陈福田太 俗”之论,杨绛先生、
李赋宁先生等都曾书面澄清绝无此事。作为当
时西南联大外文系的一名学生,您怎么看待这句活?

许渊冲:钱锺书先生读中文书、外文书数量之多,冠绝一时,我 的朋友、
历史学家何兆武先生说钱先生是“眼高手高,只说人家坏话、 不说好话”。外间盛传的这句话相信是钱先生的口气,
对三位老师的 评价也基本上是准确的、有道理的:胡适要叶公超和徐志摩、闻一多、
梁实秋合译《莎士比亚全集》,结果他一本也没有译,却让梁实秋一 个人译完了;吴宓属于古板脑筋,
他的古典文学修养很好,但对现代 文学(特别是苏俄进步文学)根本不了解;陈福田是联大外文系主任,
学的是美国英文,当时美国英文是压倒英国英文的。

沉冰:钱锺书先生给你们上课时,都讲些什么?

Thank you.
Debate Round No. 1
catanton

Pro

你比别人笨
TeddyKyle

Con

Unfortunately my opponent has replied to my argument with a very rude Mandarin sentence which translates to "you're stupid" in Google. Since he has not posted any viable rebuttals for now, please extend my arguments.

谢谢. 投票阿康!
Debate Round No. 2
catanton

Pro

catanton forfeited this round.
TeddyKyle

Con

My opponent seems to have forfeited this round and have closed his account. Arguments extended. Vote con!
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by TeddyKyle 6 years ago
TeddyKyle
Me too till I tried :3
Posted by Kinesis 6 years ago
Kinesis
Wow, I didn't know DDO supported Chinese characters.
Posted by Thaddeus 6 years ago
Thaddeus
Lol @ Teddy. Props for posting in chinese, though it would have been better had you argued the resolution.
Posted by TeddyKyle 6 years ago
TeddyKyle
You gotta be kidding me right?
Posted by kohai 6 years ago
kohai
In english!
Posted by tvellalott 6 years ago
tvellalott
RESOLUTION: Delta would be rescued horses
R1: Danube Delta horse massacre is not a solution to resolve the situation there. Personally, I think that there are other solutions, such as a mov their relocation to other areas.

LANGUAGE: Romanian.
INFO ABOUT SUBJECT: http://en.wikipedia.org...
Posted by phantom 6 years ago
phantom
Ha ha. Might find it difficult to find an opponent to debate this.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
catantonTeddyKyleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: No idea what these guys are saying nor am I going to bother running it through Google translate. Voting Con due to Pros forfeited turn.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
catantonTeddyKyleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Not a clue what was going on here, but a forfeit is a forfeit.