As far as I am concerned you are on hallowed ground with any of the Call of Duty games. Four is, however, the best by far. Four's campaign is remarkable, it makes you think you are there, the sniping is amazing. Five's campaign is just another blood and guts world war two fest. Four dared to take on a modern battlefield and succeeded. Also the plot on number four is genius. You are in a situation with unanswered questions and outcomes, you care what happens because you greatly affect the entire campaign. The two player is also better, it is interactive and enjoyable, the weapons are amazing, they look and sound the same as they do in reality.
You are wrong my friend. The guns are better in 5 because you get the flame thrower in campaign and in online. Also you Gun customize your classes like close range snipers and much more with grips banets and other things. And once again 5 has Nazi zombie mode. Also you can get dogs instead of a stupid helicopter the maps are also better.
While five has Nazi zombies that mini game quickly becomes redundant and boring. Also the flame thrower is kind of boring to use. The comparison between the dogs and the chopper is only a matter of period relevance they are equal in my eyes. Also I think that you meant bayonet when you said banet. Also there are three different sniper rifles in four. In five the main weapon, the M1 Garand is underpowered in real life that weapon chambered a 30-06 and was very powerful. On the other hand the main weapon of number four, the M16 with three round burst is very accurately portrayed in the game. So clearly four has the better weapons. Another thing, in four you get a lot more versatility n the maps in five they are all similar and get old fast.
I really don't care what you say because cod 4 has horrible graphics on the blood the maps suck because you can never find anyone and u can barely go anywhere. Oh yeah I meant banet as in the blade that goes on the end of a gun like the one you can get in cod5 not crappy cod 4. So cod5 will always be the best
I don't think that games are about blood sprays. I don't even like a lot of gore like you get in call of duty five. Also the maps are very well portrayed, they accurately depict what it is like for people fighting today, it is urban. And once again that is spelled bayonet. The bayonet is only on one gun in call of duty five anyway, that is not even an issue. All in all call of duty four is better.