The Instigator
Cod5_pwns
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Amphibian
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points

Call of duty 5 is better than call of duty 4

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Amphibian
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/26/2009 Category: Technology
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 3,428 times Debate No: 7124
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (3)

 

Cod5_pwns

Pro

Call of duty 5 is better than call of duty 4 because in 4 when you play in co-op you can never find the opponent. Also online is better on 5 and u get Nazi zombies in 5
Amphibian

Con

As far as I am concerned you are on hallowed ground with any of the Call of Duty games. Four is, however, the best by far. Four's campaign is remarkable, it makes you think you are there, the sniping is amazing. Five's campaign is just another blood and guts world war two fest. Four dared to take on a modern battlefield and succeeded. Also the plot on number four is genius. You are in a situation with unanswered questions and outcomes, you care what happens because you greatly affect the entire campaign. The two player is also better, it is interactive and enjoyable, the weapons are amazing, they look and sound the same as they do in reality.
Debate Round No. 1
Cod5_pwns

Pro

You are wrong my friend. The guns are better in 5 because you get the flame thrower in campaign and in online. Also you Gun customize your classes like close range snipers and much more with grips banets and other things. And once again 5 has Nazi zombie mode. Also you can get dogs instead of a stupid helicopter the maps are also better.
Amphibian

Con

While five has Nazi zombies that mini game quickly becomes redundant and boring. Also the flame thrower is kind of boring to use. The comparison between the dogs and the chopper is only a matter of period relevance they are equal in my eyes. Also I think that you meant bayonet when you said banet. Also there are three different sniper rifles in four. In five the main weapon, the M1 Garand is underpowered in real life that weapon chambered a 30-06 and was very powerful. On the other hand the main weapon of number four, the M16 with three round burst is very accurately portrayed in the game. So clearly four has the better weapons. Another thing, in four you get a lot more versatility n the maps in five they are all similar and get old fast.
Debate Round No. 2
Cod5_pwns

Pro

I really don't care what you say because cod 4 has horrible graphics on the blood the maps suck because you can never find anyone and u can barely go anywhere. Oh yeah I meant banet as in the blade that goes on the end of a gun like the one you can get in cod5 not crappy cod 4. So cod5 will always be the best
Amphibian

Con

I don't think that games are about blood sprays. I don't even like a lot of gore like you get in call of duty five. Also the maps are very well portrayed, they accurately depict what it is like for people fighting today, it is urban. And once again that is spelled bayonet. The bayonet is only on one gun in call of duty five anyway, that is not even an issue. All in all call of duty four is better.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by ethanw12 8 years ago
ethanw12
This might be petty but there is no such thing as Call of Duty 5 yet. World at War is separate from the main line of games and even made by a different developer.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 8 years ago
I-am-a-panda
Killzone 2 ftw
Posted by gregthedestroyer 8 years ago
gregthedestroyer
the campaign is better in cod 4. and cod 4 maps are more diverse then cod 5 but cod 4 maps suck. they only have a few good ones. online i think cod 5 is better because of everyting you get to do. guns are excellent and being able to play the campaign with all your friends is awesome. and they fact that you can have a multi party and chat. where in cod 4 the chat is only for 2 people. and cod 5 graphics are better. i play cod 5 and 4 on xbox live.
Posted by Epicism 8 years ago
Epicism
Sorry but Cod5.. You argue like an ignorant child, I agree with Bnesiba's statement. If you really want to win don't be a hot head.

Can't wait for modern warfare 2!
Posted by rangersfootballclub 8 years ago
rangersfootballclub
cod4 was far better than cod5 infact cod5's game engine was based around that of cod4 and it has been widley acknowledged that cod4 , its better than cod5
Posted by DeadLeaves93 8 years ago
DeadLeaves93
World at War was based on the design and mechanics of CoD4.

CoD4 was clearly the most groundbreaking, while WaW was just a copycat game changed to WW2.

Modern Warfare was waaaay way way more intense, action packed, and FUN.
Posted by Bnesiba 8 years ago
Bnesiba
language cod5.. language...

also, saying "i don't care what you think" in a debate round is not going to convince judges...
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by fanusc101 8 years ago
fanusc101
Cod5_pwnsAmphibianTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Alex 8 years ago
Alex
Cod5_pwnsAmphibianTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Epicism 8 years ago
Epicism
Cod5_pwnsAmphibianTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07