The Instigator
atoy120
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
rajun
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

Call of duty is the most frusterating FPS ever.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
rajun
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/7/2013 Category: Games
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 892 times Debate No: 37481
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

atoy120

Pro

COD is the most frustrating FPS because there is too many fanboys, FaZe trickshotters who brag and show off too much, campers, quickscopers, trolls, hackers, annoying little kids who always get stuck on my team and they suck, people who all they use is one weapon or all they do is knife, tryhards, and MLG geeks who think competitive gaming is a sport. COD is always laggy, the devs try to suck every living dollar out of everyone, they don't care about the community, the games always suck, and COD ghosts stole from battlefield.
rajun

Con

I accept... Be it specs and definition instead of opinion.
Good luck!
Debate Round No. 1
atoy120

Pro

COD is the most frusterating FPS ever because of all the across the map unrealistic pistol kills and lag.
rajun

Con

Thank you for your argument...

"COD is the most frusterating FPS ever because of all the across the map unrealistic pistol kills and lag."

Unrealistic pistol kills? What is pro trying to say here? Headshots? Headshots are realistic... and so is point-blank kill.
Lag? That depends on the machine which one plays the game and not on the game...

I think the worst and most frustuating FPS is Daikatana (PC). http://www.joystickdivision.com...



;

Try these... I am sure they will get the vote instead of COD.
Debate Round No. 2
atoy120

Pro

the pistol kills are unrealistic because the bullets should curve after about 10 feet, but in this game every gun has infinite range. And the lag is because of the hosts crappy connection, not mine. A lot of cod players complain about lag. This is why COD should be server based, not host based. and while game in the video oesk terrible (9999 bullets seriously O.o) COD is probable worse.
rajun

Con

Thank you for your argument Pro.

"the pistol kills are unrealistic because the bullets should curve after about 10 feet, but in this game every gun has infinite range"

seriously? Infinite range? I do not think so. Unwarranted argument as no source is backing it up. Even if it is true... Unrealistic things are very important in a game! Actually realistic things make a frustrating FPS... Such as Red orchestra 2 which requires so much skill that one will actually feel proud if he kills someone... http://www.pcgamer.com...

Really... It has done it authentic. No HUD. No Crosshair. No Info map. Nothing. One has to manually check how many bullets are left and the health is like "I am dead already"

"And the lag is because of the hosts crappy connection, not mine. A lot of cod players complain about lag."

Again no source... Do few lags on online play make a game the most frustrating? What about games which do not contain a multiplayer option? Skyrim is one and it isn't bad at all...In fact it is far from it! It is the game of the year! So, we conclude by saying that few lags on the server do not make a game the worst or the most frustrating.

"COD is probable worse."

Was that meant as a joke? Anyone with a meagre IQ will say that the FPS is far worse than COD.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by rajun 2 years ago
rajun
Or Counter Strike
Posted by Geckofrog7 3 years ago
Geckofrog7
Join the club.
Play ARMA.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by kyro90 3 years ago
kyro90
atoy120rajunTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: I really have no need to explain my reasoning. Honestly, this debate was rediculous.
Vote Placed by leojm 3 years ago
leojm
atoy120rajunTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not have sources. His arguments were cheap and not convincing,