Cam Newton is better than Odell Beckam Jr.
Debate Rounds (2)
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh h h j hjhjh jkhjlhkjl hjkh kjlth gjthgjl hgjlhgjkgehgkjehjkghjgehrjkgherjkgherjkg herjkgh jkrghjklghjrhglerhjgkrejgerhjhgkjergherjkgherkjlgreglkjerjkergerjkgheelherghelghrjegherjrgfheghrghjervfhjegfhjegfhjekfgfhjegfhejwgfhjewg whjghj3bhjfhjgr
Bruh Cam Newton was the inventor of the dab, but odell is just catching a ball with 1 hand. Thats not cool. Dabbig is.
Secondly, since my opponent has made no claim as to the skill of Cam Newton in comparison to OBJ, besides dabbing, I will note that OBJ has made MANY touchdown catches with one hand, a feat that would be considered incomplete by any other receiver.
Pro should lose conduct/grammar for 1st round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by DebaterGood 4 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro loses conduct/grammar because i the first round, he just wrote jibberish in order to waste time. Con was able to prove Pro's arguments as false, so arguments to Con. Sources are equal, none gave any.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.