The Instigator
kangaroosaretrash
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

Can Jawdinz walk on water?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/19/2015 Category: Fashion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 857 times Debate No: 75507
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (6)

 

kangaroosaretrash

Pro

So, I came across this guy the other day and he said, Jawdinz can only tip toe, but cannot walk on water. I was confused by this because this guy is a scrub and I don't believe his opinion to be true. I certainly believe Jawdinz can walk on water because they can splish-splashing in the rain, so leave your opinion in the jawdinz below thank you and have a jawdinz day!
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

I accept. PRO has the complete BOP, and must prove that Jawdinz can walk on water. If he fails to do that, you negate by default.
Debate Round No. 1
kangaroosaretrash

Pro

kangaroosaretrash forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
kangaroosaretrash

Pro

kangaroosaretrash forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
kangaroosaretrash

Pro

kangaroosaretrash forfeited this round.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

Extend. PRO has yet to fulfill his burden of proof that Jawdinz can walk on water. He provides zero evidence for this position, or for his assertion that he can "splish-splash in the rain," or how this would in any way advance his BOP.
Debate Round No. 4
kangaroosaretrash

Pro

kangaroosaretrash forfeited this round.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

Vote CON.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by kangaroosaretrash 1 year ago
kangaroosaretrash
They can because jawdinz can rek the land so why not the water.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
kangaroosaretrashResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
9spaceking
kangaroosaretrashResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
kangaroosaretrashResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
kangaroosaretrashResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments - Con. Pro had the entirety of the burden of proof, which they failed to fulfill, partly due to their forfeiture and bare assertions. Conduct - Con. Pro forfeited the majority of the debate, which is rarely acceptable conduct in any debate setting. Thus, arguments and conduct to Con, due to Pro's full forfeit. As always, happy to clarify this RFD.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 1 year ago
Ragnar
kangaroosaretrashResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
kangaroosaretrashResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF